Because law enforcement will do whatever they're told to do by whoever is the last stop in the accountability chain.
This where Judge Dredd comes from it's the dystopian end game. Courts have the final say, so it's only a matter of time before they end up on the front line.
I understand what you're saying, but courts don't have final say and this isn't Judge Dredd. It sounds like you agree, the judge has zero authority to issue any such decree. At least, that's how I'm reading what you've stated. If they fail to comply, who's going to enforce it? Who's responsible at an ISP to comply or even ensure compliance is met? Who is billed for the time? I guess all bills are sent directly to the judge or the court to pay for costs?
I would think the original plaintiffs would have to sue the ISPs
Thing is, I can't see that these ISPs were party to the original suit. Meaning they've had no opportunity to plead any case as to why they would or would not, could or could not, block certain websites, or how much money it would cost them to enforce. I guess that comes when and if the original plaintiffs seek enforcement.
(post is archived)