No doubt, there are all kinds of schemes to get energy. The point I'm making is that green energy is a farce.
Looking at a steam engine, one could argue it's green because it only generates steam (water) into the air. Except, inconveniently, there's a big smoke stack billowing out black smoke as it needs to use a combustible material, like wood, to generate the steam.
What people will do is come up with a way to hide the ugly smoke stack. Usually, the trick is to move it away from sight. With a steam engine, you could pressurize a gas in a bottle and attach that to the steam engine. The consumer would no longer see black smoke. The engine would appear to run with no visible exhaust. It's now green!
No doubt, there are all kinds of schemes to get energy. The point I'm making is that green energy is a farce.
Looking at a steam engine, one could argue it's green because it only generates steam (water) into the air. Except, inconveniently, there's a big smoke stack billowing out black smoke as it needs to use a combustible material, like wood, to generate the steam.
What people will do is come up with a way to hide the ugly smoke stack. Usually, the trick is to move it away from sight. With a steam engine, you could pressurize a gas in a bottle and attach that to the steam engine. The consumer would no longer see black smoke. The engine would appear to run with no visible exhaust. It's now green!
(post is archived)