Nobody argued that the libertarian party didn't oppose the measure.
So your argument is that they opposed it without comment?
My argument is that their comments were not the ones you alleged.
I've sent you 2 essays and you ignored 99% of the words. I am certain, after this experience, sending another quote would do neither of us any good.
In some other dimension, I send you a quote and you will say the speaker is not libertarian enough.
Things like this happen when people are not genuine.
In this case under current examination, for example, It is already certain you believe LP can somehow stand in opposition to something without even making a public comment.
You don't even believe this. Of course you are well aware there exists public statements from the LP party on this about why they voted NO. But it is a game you play because you lack the intellectual honestly to figure I was right. The LP stood against the proposition for the reasons already cited, and that, for some reason, makes you sad and defensive. Denial and intellectual dishonesty.
(post is archived)