What a slew of incomprehensible babel.
ALL OF THE WORDS explain precisely how they feel about animals, as a sponsoring belief. Every word. Look at the title of the essays. Look at the thesis. Look at the conclusions drawn. These are called relevant sponsoring thoughts That's the definition of a core belief about animals. And it's absurdly pathetic that you need me to connect the dots to how that translates into birds stretching their wings, as if you are blind and need a translator to forcefully Hellen Keller your hands together in sign language when it's already there.
Do you really need me to quote the 2009 minutes from the CA LP Representatives that voted no, for you to believe it?
Yes, if you're going to claim somebody said something I expect you to provide a direct reference to them saying that thing. That's how references work.
And if I provide it for you. What will you say then? Should we fast forward to the part where you play ((games)) in denial?
(post is archived)