WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

/>Choice between a 150 watt and 350 watt charger. />Using the 150 watt permits the trailer to stay hitched. />350 watt requires the trailer to be unhitched because the charger is in a back up accessible parking space. />Spend 10 minutes to park and unhitch the trailer. />Still required 30 minutes to charge to 93% />"Look at all the money we saved!"

How about no. The reality is that once EVs reach ~12% of vehicles driven, the equivalent energy cost with be at parity with gas.

[–] 8 pts

They get it wrong. You're not supposed to go camping in your electric hummer, and you certainly won't be authorised the necessary credits to recharge. You are meant to stay in your cubical and eat your bug rations until you are selected for assisted death. For the greater good, of course!

[–] 0 pt

Lol. GM has already been doing this control with your gas cars and trucks for 20 years. If you're thinking this is just coming with electric cars, it's you that's the retard.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Difference is i can throw two 5 gallon jerry cans in the back and be good. In that electric your screwed.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You can't be good if GM remotely disabled your car.

On the other hand, if SHTF anyone with solar panels, a wind turbine, a generator, or micro-hydro can fuel up indefinitely. If SHTF and all the gas is bought up by panic buying you've just run out of luck in your truck.

[–] 6 pts

Electricity: How does it work?

Apparently these idiots don’t know.

[–] 4 pts

Lol. Morons. Show me a gas truck that gets the window sticker mileage while towing. Are the reporters really that stupid?

[–] 0 pt

This article is a jewish lie to split the difference. Extremely few of the population are retarded enough to fall for the (((EV))) lie. So this pushes lies that "yeah but the (((EV))) is still better sometimes!!!". Let me know in 3 years when your battery holds 30% of "full", is 30% efficient of it's power stored and charges at a much slow rate.

[–] 0 pt

Well, my electric car is going on 11 years with 167,000 miles on it. The battery is still north of 80%. It depends on the manufacturer and the quality of their batteries and battery management.

[–] 0 pt

Bullshit. (((EV)))s lose 30% of their battery capability incredibly quickly.

[–] 2 pts

Fake news. The people who will be buying these EVs won't actually be using them for anything more than grocery getting feel good status symbols. If you need a work truck, you buy a truck that works.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

There exists buyers who need their trucks to do truck stuff 5 days a week, who would never buy this vehicle, if they think it through. That is true.

But you are forgetting

People most often get a truck for the one time every so often they actually need to do truck stuff. Even if you only take the camper out once per year. You are still going to need that feature.

That means driving from Denver to Colorado Springs and back, is something many people will be tricked into finding out the hard way that they can't do truck stuff any more, beyond moving an appliance a short distance.

Unknown to most buyers, they've completely removed themselves from the market for out-of-town contractors, ranchers, longer distance travelers, campers, freezing-weather foragers, and just plain rational utilitarians; and have placed a bet on the "luxury" family who just want a fancy truck to run-local-errands-and-never-carry-a -load-far" is going to pick up all that slack in sales. Or buyers will be tricked into buying something that won't give them what they want. That's a big bet. They're basically now competing against the ever-so-popular S.U.V's, hoping buyers want a (limited distance) truck bed over a (vast distance) spacious or fold-down rear hatch. That's an entirely different category of buyers. (I would suspect that market is already mostly saturated with Cherokees, Wranglers, 4-Runners, Yukons.) Are dealerships going to flat out lie to customers and push the truck onto unwitting consumers? Yes.

But people who go to buy a truck actually want their truck to be able to do truck stuff.

It is yet to be seen how successful the dealers will be in convincing people that's not why they want a truck, but trickery is definitely on the menu.

[–] 1 pt

I see electric vehicles as a great addition to a business's fleet when when the furthest your business needs to travel is less the 150 miles round trip per day. They, (EVs), are not suitable for long distance trips.

[–] 0 pt

It only makes sense if you have solar, only plan to do city driving for around 30 miles per day, get it a few years used, install a used charger yourself on the cheap, get a one of the tiny smartcar sized deathmobile models, and plan to sell it after a few years.

a horse and buggy would be more efficient and greener...

[–] 0 pt

Didnt you hear that horse farts cause global warming?

[–] 0 pt

What a beautiful and thoroughly impractical electric SUV.

[–] 0 pt

I can’t stand the modern ADD writing style where every sentence gets its own paragraph.

[–] 0 pt

Lower cost refueling/recharging? Hummer wins.

Cope. That's a giant lie. It costs significantly more per mile to charge an (((EV))) than a ICE vehicle.