I mean, the context is talking about a theoretical scenario in which robot dogs are weaponized and attacking you. Saying "just shoot them" is not a call to violence when talking about fighting against hypothetical robot dogs.
His reply was to my comment about "enemy combatants", which is a generalized term, but the fact that I'm taking effort to generalize terms should be taken into account.
Even saying "just shoot them" about hypothetical enemy combatants isn't a credible or specific threat though, and is thus protected speech (whether or not it should be allowed on the forum or not as a precaution is a different question).
Generally speaking I don't consider anything that a (jewwed, faggot clown world) court would consider protected speech to be a "call to violence", myself.
That said I concede the point about not referring specifically to the robot dogs scenario.
(post is archived)