This sounds like FUD. Failure rates during animal testing of medical devices are normally much higher than the handful they reported. Even for well understood technology like stints.
Animals dying due to accidents or their own stupidity is also ubiquitous because they're testing installation techniques and research animals are bred for genetic consistency. That's good for replicability, but means the animals are inbred to the point of retardation. Scratching out implants is nothing compared to tearing cage-mates apart out of sheer neuroticism. Which research animals do all the time.
Holy fuck, jews are God's test animals??!?
Why wouldn't they clone them? When you need to keep the animals from being a possible failure point it only seems to make sense.
Cloning is extraordinarily expensive and failure prone. Inbreeding is 99% as good for producing consistent test results and dirt cheap.
Well, all of the animals were apparently terminal regardless of the brain chip. Probably because they were engineered to be. They were going to meet a quick end either way.
Let people volunteer if they want to test this tech. I doubt it will be hard to find plenty that are more than willing.
Yep, research animals arent bred for longevity. And whether the test kills them or not, they're typically sac'd regardless once the test is complete.
The entire article talks about how they weren't terminal - they were young and healthy and several of the deaths were directly attributed to the brain chips... Did you even read it?
Ive read articles on both sides. If anything, when the MSM is pushing one side extensively I tend to not believe them. Im not going to judge either way in this case. I stand by the "if humans want to volunteer, let them". Just make sure they are aware of what they are signing up for.
(post is archived)