WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

809

published 1:15am.

Now,

[Archived copy](https://archive.today/Pg99x) published 1:15am. Now, ["404 ... We couldn't find the content you're looking for."](https://pic8.co/sh/8evbF8.png)

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

They got (((the call))).

[–] 1 pt

I agree. This is the first time I've seen breitbart do this. The article was a essentially a reprint of the epoch times article published earlier in the day. Scrubbing it from breitbart wasn't going to make it go away.

[–] 2 pts

Breitbart is run by a kike. It's a controlled opposition outlet.

[–] 0 pt

I had heard that, and this is the first hard evidence I've seen that it is true (but I don't go there much for news anymore like I did 20 years ago).

[–] 2 pts

Not surprised.

breitbart kicked me off years ago for my repeatedly pointing out their hook-nosed biases.

[–] 2 pts

They do this frequently with any drug they don't like. With vaccines they don't have an actual placebo group. They give one group the full vaccine and the other all the garbage in the vaccine without the supposedly viral part. People will be poisoned in both groups.

For drugs they pick and choose the results and dismiss people with adverse reactions for various reasons usually saying they dropped out or didn't follow instructions.They love to give extreme amounts or too little in drugs they know work but want to make look bad.

It's easy to screw up a study to get the results you want when everyone is on your pocket.

[–] 0 pt

Agree, but why would breitbart scrub the article overnight? A phone call to "shut it down"? It was essentially a reprint from an epoch times article, also carried by a couple of other outlets.

[–] 1 pt

Someone told them to yank it. Simple. It's easy to threaten them for spreading ' misinformation' now.

[–] 2 pts

It's even easier to tell them, no more advertising for you.

[–] 1 pt

Here's why: (((Andrew Breibart)))