WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I'm never one of the people that's suspicious about this sort of thing.

Watch the lower half of the face; I've seen him speak many times, and it just looks off. There's something off about this one.

I am probably wrong, but I've watched it twice, and I can't shake the feeling.

I would have just commented in the s/Qstorm thread, but is a retard who banned me for a comment yesterday.

I'm never one of the people that's suspicious about this sort of thing. Watch the lower half of the face; I've seen him speak many times, and it just looks off. There's something off about this one. I am probably wrong, but I've watched it twice, and I can't shake the feeling. I would have just commented in the s/Qstorm thread, but @Crensch is a retard who banned me for a comment yesterday.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I'm not conservative. It has nothing to do with virtue either.

I was simply judging you, for being so fixated on something so petty. That sort of obsession is not healthy or productive.

I wasn't that pleased with it. It was rather obvious. Was surprised you didn't get it, and thought it best to point it out before this got any more embarrassing. Would you have preferred if I pretended not to notice you missed it, to safeguard your feelings?

[–] 0 pt

It has nothing to do with virtue either.

What? Were you possessed when you made that comment?

I was simply judging you

petty

Haha.

Was surprised you didn't get it, and thought it best to point it out before this got any more embarrassing.

I got your dad joke. You had to point it out because it bothered you I didn't acknowledge it.

[–] 0 pt

What? Were you possessed when you made that comment?

> conservative virtue spaz

Haha.

Not all judgment is petty. Some things deserve to be judged.

You had to point it out because it bothered you I didn't acknowledge it.

I pointed it out because you were fishing for angles to prove you're the bigger skeptic, in response to "I doubt it".

[–] 0 pt

Fine, let's forget the comparing skepticism angle. I'll even admit I might have been condescending by going 'fishing' for that.

But you can appreciate how condescending your very first comment on this post was. Without having a fucking shred of knowledge about me, and totally discounting all of the caveats I introduced in the post (for example, that I considered it pretty unlikely that the video was faked), you came in here and insulted my dignity. Rather, you said I had none.

How skeptical was it for you to make those cunty assumptions without any evidence?

I'd call you delusional. But I think that, deep down, you already know you are.

It's just that you've long since lost that last shred of dignity, which might have made you feel ashamed about it.

Doesn't sound like you're too skeptical about your own half-cocked assumption making.