Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (427).
[–] • 3 pts

>The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flag earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

So if unicorns suddenly became the subject and people insulted them as well, does that mean there's something to unicorns? Would that raise flags?

[–] • 0 pt

I think this is a straw man argument but I'm not 100% certain.

Muddying the waters with topics and questions that don't matter as well

Shill tactics 101

Nice work yall need a new play book

[–] • 0 pt

I don't know if that's a straw man, seems like a comparable assumption. To qualify as a straw man, I would have to build a false premise (something you didn't say) and refute it. Here, I'm merely using the same logic and applying it equally to something else without refuting anything to see if I can make the same conclusion. I can't. Ergo, the logic is wrong.