Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

146

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (427).
[–] • 0 pt

Blanket statements like "film doesn't work in space" is so concentrated with bullsit, its something only a manuere factory can compete with. That bullshit is so thick. How do you flat earthers live with yourselves making false premises up to suit your theory?

Where is the fly on Mars rover?

What is this magical radiation that would ruin film?

Where is the landscape video that has been found on earth?

Let me guess, you just collect hypothesis but haven't actually investigated any aforementioned ideas.

[–] • 0 pt

hypothesis' would be the correct use. What do you mean where is the magical radiation? Supposedly space is filled with all kinds of radiation radiating from stars' exothermic processes. If space is full of radiation the film would have been nothing but a white screen for the entire recording. I am not stating that the earth is flat, but I do wholeheartedly believe that the film of the moonwalk is absolute bullshit. That combined with Buzz Aldrin being a stammering pussy and not swearing on the bible that he walked on the moon. If he really did then why not just fucking swear on the bible that you did? Its like saying to swear on the bible you went to work. Any abject person should have no problem admitting that if they really did. The prize of the grand science deception is your eternal soul.

[–] • 0 pt

and the fly video and the landscape analysis has been floating around since the rover deployed. I will dig it up and produce it tomorrow for you.

[–] • 0 pt

If you change your mind, I won't blame you.

[–] • 0 pt

by the way the landscape that is used as mars is devon island in canada.

[–] • 0 pt

If that is where it is filmed why has not one person shown a single photo that matches Mars terrain? Just one photo.

[–] • 0 pt

They abosolutely have. The idea sounds so ludicrous you have cognitive dissonance and cannot even think it could remotely be possible. Think back to when you first got redpilled and realized the jews run the world. Was it not the same exact thing? For me It was extreme cognitive dissonance. All I am saying is keep an open mind and go to google maps and start looking at devon island. They have found the exact landscape that was used in the official shots.