Flat earth is an interesting theory. I believe 100% the moonwalk was staged. Exposure film shouldn't work in space if the bombardment of particles is true. Ask yourself why Buzz Aldrin refuses to swear on the bible that he walked on the moon? Why is it they can only go to places that cannot be verified by us on earth? Why did they "destroy" the technology to get to the moon? Seems to me it should be as easy as navigating to mars. IT should be some calculations and trajectory prediction. There's a vested interest in us sending our tax dollars to NASA. I just wonder because theres literally no footage of earth spinning. If there were really spacecraft hovering above earth with independent thrusters then why no videos of the spinning globe? ON the long distance space probes they couldn't take one fucking video of the earth spinning? MARS rover literally had a fucking FLY spotted on it. The landscape that was shown as "MARS" has been found already on earth. NASA is a sham. SPACEX is a sham. All control mechanism's.
FE can't be real if every other planet, star (hell even electron) we see is round. Nature reuses shapes, and a spinning object is not going to be flat.
If you're an ant on a pool table and all you see are round objects around you, it's a logical fallacy to assume the table is round too.
Also planets aren't spheres, they are lights as proven by amateur video.
Sorry, doesn't compute. If I am an ant on a pool table, I am clearly not standing on a ball or claiming the other balls are flat. I would be standing on the galaxy plane if that is your equivalent.
If the earth was flat how can a round moon rotate around it without changing the distance? I have been all over the world the the size is the same. I also wore contacts and glasses at one time in my life so I understand why large moonrises exist at times.
Which logical fallacy is that?
You don’t live on an ice cream truck just because you see one out of your window. And “round” is different from “sphere.”
Is sphere closer to round or flat?
A spheroid, or ellipsoid of revolution, is a quadric surface obtained by rotating an ellipse about one of its principal axes; in other words, an ellipsoid with two equal semi-diameters. A spheroid has circular symmetry.
Revolution means arc which means curved or round. All spheriods have some measure of round. The earth is both round and spherical.
" I just wonder because theres literally no footage of earth spinning" What about long exposure pictures from different location at night showing the axial spin of the earth relative to the night sky?
Get above the article circle in summer you can actually see the sun rotating around you rather than a sun rise sun set.
If anything that just proves we're stationary and the lights above us rotate on their set paths.
How could stars "millions" Of light years away, that do NOT orbit us, make perfect circles around us?
There is footage of the earth spinning. Geosynchronous sats have been a thing for a while.
Weather sats also take pictures over time.
no footage of earth spinning
There are at least four videos of earth at this very moment.
This is a deep fake by the jews and the central bankers.
Then why is it censored so much?
I find it funny because this could easily be CGI. I'm talking about a space probe leaving our earth and then looking back and taking pictures of our earth spinning. Nobody walked on the moon and nobody has been to mars. I urge you to prove otherwise.
I don't understand what you want. There are photos of the earth from space. Are you expecting them to be blurry because the earth is spinning? Are you looking for an uncut video of a probe leaving earth, then turning around to show it?
Blanket statements like "film doesn't work in space" is so concentrated with bullsit, its something only a manuere factory can compete with. That bullshit is so thick. How do you flat earthers live with yourselves making false premises up to suit your theory?
Where is the fly on Mars rover?
What is this magical radiation that would ruin film?
Where is the landscape video that has been found on earth?
Let me guess, you just collect hypothesis but haven't actually investigated any aforementioned ideas.
hypothesis' would be the correct use. What do you mean where is the magical radiation? Supposedly space is filled with all kinds of radiation radiating from stars' exothermic processes. If space is full of radiation the film would have been nothing but a white screen for the entire recording. I am not stating that the earth is flat, but I do wholeheartedly believe that the film of the moonwalk is absolute bullshit. That combined with Buzz Aldrin being a stammering pussy and not swearing on the bible that he walked on the moon. If he really did then why not just fucking swear on the bible that you did? Its like saying to swear on the bible you went to work. Any abject person should have no problem admitting that if they really did. The prize of the grand science deception is your eternal soul.
and the fly video and the landscape analysis has been floating around since the rover deployed. I will dig it up and produce it tomorrow for you.
If you change your mind, I won't blame you.
by the way the landscape that is used as mars is devon island in canada.
If that is where it is filmed why has not one person shown a single photo that matches Mars terrain? Just one photo.
Anyone who thinks the Apollo moon walks didn't occur has lost contact with reality. Seriously, get a grip.
Anyone who blindly believes that it happened because they showed you a hollywood reproduction has lost it. Exposure film doesnt work with all the Rays bouncing around space. And thats what they supposedly used. It may be possible that they really did land and walk on the moon but that fucking film is not an actual film of it. Period.
(post is archived)