WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Images of earth from high altitudes does not prove satellites, again this is logical fallacy. High altitude balloons are a perfectly reasonable explanation.

Please inform me how airplanes prove earth is round

[–] 1 pt

From my days learning ATC, the distance that a plane travels is greater than the distance on the ground, because it has to cover the "arc".

[–] 1 pt

Did you also learn that planes have to constantly nose down to take in account of this "arc"?

[–] 2 pts

Not that I can recall, but it's been almost a decade since Combat Control Apprentice Course (ATC). I always thought the micro bursts were crazy. Also, long range shooting and surveying takes into account the curvature of the earth.

planes have to constantly nose down to take in account of this "arc"?

No, they do not. Pilots adjust elevator trim, they don't sit there and constantly hold the nose down.

Flat Earthers.. smh

[–] 1 pt

Well you wouldn't, because space is curved. Flying at a constant altitude means flying on a curved path. It's about the reference frame, after all.

Does the moon constantly have to 'nose down' to orbit the earth?

[–] 0 pt

You seem confused and accidentally down voted facts. I'm posting the comment again so you can properly provide an up vote which indicates you are interested in facts and truth. Clearly you learned something and that's good, right?

A down vote here clearly communicates you are dishonest and hate facts and truth. My linked comment also has links to indepsputible facts. Perhaps seeing facts for the first time are what confused you?

Did you also learn that planes have to constantly nose down to take in account of this "arc"?

This is to which I previously referenced and you declined to challenge me. But that's okay as I already answered it for someone else.

https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/339586/5a3d2efe-690a-4eb0-9b9b-2046e6d0b82d

Another flat earth talking point completely destroyed.

Next.

[–] 0 pt

Other factors play into it more. Slight thrust adjustment can change it more, lift, attitude, altitude...

[–] 0 pt

Your position on sat is already invalidated. Show me the miles of teathers. Since you can't, you don't have an argument. Your position is disproved. Next.

Please inform me how airplanes prove earth is round

The contrary is actually you guy's common talking point. You state your premise and I'll destroy it. Go.

[–] 0 pt

https://files.catbox.moe/kopeko.mp4

Destroy this video. TL;DW someone 1 foot above the water on the shore can see > 9 miles. Calling it fake is not good enough, PROVE it is fake if you believe.

No optical illusion arguments unless you can prove it using refraction and reflection of the water with a diagram.

Is that challenge enough?

[–] 0 pt

Link proving it wrong already provided in one if my many comments here.

Please read the others, follow links, learn basic science.

That was easy.