WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

461

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Once we consent; those who made the offer, gain the false authority to act in the name of (in nomine) the words; brands; idols (time, past, present, future, and everything build upon them), which allows them to define/redefine them at their will. Meanwhile those who consented by free will of choice to believe/not believe the offer; will be within the conflict of reason (truth versus false), which a) represents control over both sides of every conflict, since all conflicts of reason are defined by consent to the contract of belief (off/consent under the laws of nature), and b) they maintain these conflicts of reason by constant suggestion of contradictions to both sides (truth/false).

Ah, yes. We can consent to things we don't fully understand because we were tricked into consenting to them. That sure sounds like what "consent" means to me. If they actually gave a shit about our free will and our consent there would be no tricks. They simply seek dominance over others.

ALL equals electric motion; ONE equals magnetic sustenance. ALL (potentiality) represents the base of each ONE (potential) within. It's not so much cycles of life as it is frequency (a sinus curve) going in an out of base.

magnetic sustenance?

ALL is ONE in energy (potentiality); snip , while also creating the need for cooling (liquid).

I see a lot of knowledge and statements here but I don't exactly see an end meaning or a general conclusion you're intending to convey from the various concepts you're talking about.

Don't fall for the heliocentric lie versus flat earth truth conflict of reason....

I intended to convey that simply learning about flat earth was my catalyst for thinking time is an illusion, I was not trying to convey my belief in one system or the other.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[+] [deleted] 0 pt