My bad, the diameter is different.... then by how much approximatley? 0.5% maybe? Quite possibly 0% since the sun is emmanating a completely different energy and its rays give an illusion that it is bigger than it is.
Either way - that doesn't change the premise of my example. That it is exponentially less probable that they are vastly different scales + distances + trajectories in the Freemasonic heliocentric (hypothetical) model. Each variable introducing an order of magnitude extra complexity.
Versus Occam's Razor and a completely observable model that the sun and moon are the same relative size and approx same altitude and follow similar trajectories (and are not spinning) thus making a solar eclipse not such an extraordinary feat of probability & science fiction but rather a local feature of our ecosystem.
We both seem to agree on the solar eclipse feature but you subscribe to a model that is a gorillian times bigger with inflated hypothetical numbers and magic properties invented by Freemasons that cannot be proven while I am working based on a smaller, observable, and thus far more accurate model.
And nice way to skirt the issue about them choosing 666,000 MPH; you didn't answer the question - what are the odds a satanic cult would choose 66,600 MPH as the speed for which their new religion is based ? (metric system being only adopted in apparently 1795, we are obviously dealing with a multi-century cult who has been cooking up fables since long before that; heliocentrism reportedly published in 1543... and some of its 'early teachers' were burned at the stake... hmm, wonder why?)
(post is archived)