Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

969

Think of it this way?

Can u believe 18 to 50 year Olds are taking this shit!

These same people if you asked them to make 2500 dollars to partake in an experimental drug trial that was in its final phase they would have said hell fucking no! Final phase aka it's basically safe after years of testing and research

Think of it this way? Can u believe 18 to 50 year Olds are taking this shit! These same people if you asked them to make 2500 dollars to partake in an experimental drug trial that was in its final phase they would have said hell fucking no! Final phase aka it's basically safe after years of testing and research

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (73).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

the Sun and Moon are the exact relative size in the sky

They're not though, that's why you get a ring with annular solar eclipses. Why? Because the Moon is further away from the Earth at that time, therefore presents a smaller image and therefore doesn't fully cover the Sun.

Also, in regards to the speed of the Earth moving - the only country who uses the imperial system for speed is the US. Everywhere else doesn't, therefore that number is 107182 km/h.

[–] • 1 pt

you sound like a pissy jew who doesn't like having all his lies exposed

[–] • 0 pt

My bad, the diameter is different.... then by how much approximatley? 0.5% maybe? Quite possibly 0% since the sun is emmanating a completely different energy and its rays give an illusion that it is bigger than it is.

Either way - that doesn't change the premise of my example. That it is exponentially less probable that they are vastly different scales + distances + trajectories in the Freemasonic heliocentric (hypothetical) model. Each variable introducing an order of magnitude extra complexity.

Versus Occam's Razor and a completely observable model that the sun and moon are the same relative size and approx same altitude and follow similar trajectories (and are not spinning) thus making a solar eclipse not such an extraordinary feat of probability & science fiction but rather a local feature of our ecosystem.

We both seem to agree on the solar eclipse feature but you subscribe to a model that is a gorillian times bigger with inflated hypothetical numbers and magic properties invented by Freemasons that cannot be proven while I am working based on a smaller, observable, and thus far more accurate model.

And nice way to skirt the issue about them choosing 666,000 MPH; you didn't answer the question - what are the odds a satanic cult would choose 66,600 MPH as the speed for which their new religion is based ? (metric system being only adopted in apparently 1795, we are obviously dealing with a multi-century cult who has been cooking up fables since long before that; heliocentrism reportedly published in 1543... and some of its 'early teachers' were burned at the stake... hmm, wonder why?)