>Complaining about meaningless shit
Zerohedge isn't mickey magazine, get used to it, and move on
Thank you
They got their facts wrong. Yes or no?
Is there an HIV insert, yes or no?
They aren't an aggregator if they are hand selecting what to include.
I make aggregators. I know all about them. I make simple, stupid ones, which then feed into a second tier, which then feeds into a third, smarter tier, and eventually the good stuff rises to the top. First tier is just based on keywords. Second is based on viewing velocity. Third uses metatabling to determine relevance.
I do not consider ZeroHedge to be an aggregator, at all.
I generally find their information to be good but my primary criticism is that they do jump the gun when it comes to hoping the stock market crashes. Personally, I am opposed to those who seek to crash the US market and those who serve their agenda... however occasionally it may occur.
>They got their facts wrong. Yes or no?
Got the facts of the story updated until its conclusion, therefore the answer is no, and you won't like the answer, and I don't give a shit, the end
(post is archived)