My position is that they are the same as well. Political labels are fairly arbitrary groupings of lists of items that no one can agree on. I don't think it is too usefull to use terms like communism, totalinariasm, fascism, capitalism and so forth. None of those labels are coherent lists of anything that anyone can agree on wholly.
That's because kikes have muddied the waters, so no one knows their ass from their elbow now.
No, the opposite. I spent some time thinking about this:
1) First, words like racism, communism and capitalism were directly created by jews in the last 150 years.
2) Jews are a separate species of human and one of the qualities that their species has is a kind if unique tricksterism. The seem to enjoy abstract symbolic thought and they love taking ideas appart and putting them together in ways that are usually harmful.
Like cancer.
So, take communism and capitalism. These terms did not exist before jews invented them in the last couple of hundred years. Before then, the world understood that there is only one foundational concept that describes all economics: trade. You pick up a thing, someone else picks up a thing, you trade it and you get automatic price discovery.
What the jew does is, looks at that and starts applying rules to the trade transaction. These rules are a set of abstract principles, the jew groups them into different arbitrary categories and gives them labels.
Now, they created something new out of nothing and white people spend all their time arguing about this new thing that jews created that did not exist before. White people argue and fight wars now over these new things that did not exist before. White people rise up and do the dirty work of the jew communists because they have been convinced this abstract idea of communism actually exists.
When it never existed, it doesn't mean anything and there is only trade.
All of these things are just labels for arbitrary groupings of abstract economic concepts that really are meaningless. The only concept that exists is trade.
'fascism' is used by lazy journos when they want something to sound bad
nobody has ever heard about Mao's Red Guard, despite it being a direct comparison to current events
And you'd be 100% wrong.
I'lm slowly putting together a response to that question. I'll post it when I feel it's done. However the simple fact that such a benign statement (any of them on pointing out Fascism's good) gets so much attention and pushback proves the post.
Take your time. Would like to hear your thoughts.
(post is archived)