You don't believe the moon landings were real and had to be faked because we didn't have the technology to do those things, yet you also believe we have the technology to control the weather, control people's minds, start fires with space weapons (DEWs) and that 5G was created to activate the jewflu virus.
You are convinced the government/military is always leaps and bounds ahead in technology but the public is kept oblivious to this fact and yet you also think the government/military is so behind on technology that spaceflight and moon landings are impossible.
You believe we have vast underground facilities hidden from the public and that Antarctica is filled with technological advances of an alien sort and the government/military is using that to further their world takeover, but at the same time you think they are so inept that they can't even fake the moon landing footage well enough to convince you they are real.
You believe in Project Looking Glass and other fantastical creations that can see into the future despite all of science saying this is not possible due to indeterminate probabilities yet you say the physics for the moon landings is all wrong as if you are an expert on the matter instead of just repeating the same old talking points that have been used for decades that you didn't even come up with yourself.
Every day you become more retarded than the day before. If you're not some glowie plant put here to sow division and discord, then you really are one dumb ass retard. You get upset when people say Q was (((fake and gay))) and give you sound reasons as to why but you then spout this sort of shit like it's gospel. You're not a critical thinker. You're not a skeptic. You don't even seem to be a regular thinker. You do, however, glow quite well.
So you believe the government is telling the truth regarding the “moon landing”?
As with everything the government says and does, there is a mix of truth and lie in it all. There are some things that they do that are evil lies and they lock up the files for it for a lifetime, like JFK and more recently the jewflu jab data. There are also things that they hide the lies in committee retellings of the events, like 9/11 and the Warren Commission.
The moon landings are a bit different. They didn't lock up the files nor did they need a commission to craft the story in a particular narrative. The whole space race thing was too public to easily lie about it or fake it because the rest of the world was able to verify certain aspects of the events that could not be faked. Because of that, I have to err on the side of the moon landings happening for real, but with the publicly visible version of the story being highly edited or simulated.
Why do that? Simple. They couldn't afford to have anything they were unaware of beforehand get out on live TV. They needed to ensure that if they discovered anything that might be a threat (or advantage) to the US that they could see and handle it before it got out in the public. Also, if disaster had struck and the crew were killed, they could reduce the impact or sweep it under the rug more easily by delaying and editing the data/transmissions. The local TV and radio stations do this all the time so that they don't get caught in a situation that would be bad for them if broadcasted. CNN failed to do this on NYE and got trolled by fake twatter accounts.
So yeah, I believe it happened but that we were given a different view of the whole thing. The technology we gained from the moonshot program is too real to be something that they just faked on a movie set with Kubrick. The truth is a mix of reality and fictional creation. That's basically what all of reality is for us the last 100 years or longer.
How about this: the general public is so fucking retarded that they will believe whatever the idiot box tells them to believe. Even that the Apollo LM landed on the moon.
I'm very much in line with what you've written. Here is something I wrote on it a while ago but never posted. I think it is still a possibility as it does help to explain a few things that seem a little odd to me, but as I haven't yet learned enough about them to properly understand whether they're normal and expected I just tried to formulate something that seemed plausible to account for them until I acquire more knowledge on the matters.
(*Edited a sentence. I should have re-read what I had written before pasting it and hitting send, or re-written it all over again to be up to date with what my current thoughts on the topic are.)
I believe that it did happen, but that the first landing actually occurred quite some time before the 'live' broadcast to the public. What was shown to the public was not fully 'live', but was instead a combination of live participants (actors, directors, controllers) following a script and fake interacting with both original landing footage, the ongoing live landing, and also with footage of re-created scenes to help with blending and selling the production as occurring perfectly and as planned.
The United States government couldn't afford for the event to be anything short of absolutely perfect, let alone risk it being unsuccessful, due to the political world climate at the time. They needed it to be successful and for this success to be seen by the world as having occurred perfectly as planned and without issues.
Can you imagine the world watching the astronauts suffocating live on air due to a pinhole leak in a seal, or as they burned alive in a cabin fire (as happened during testing of the module and which demanded a total redesign)?
A total failure being broadcast live and to the whole world would have been extremely detrimental to the status and power of the United States government and its military on the world stage, as well as damaging to the US citizenry's view of their government and their nation's power and status. It was also an event of great national pride that it was the United States that took this step for all mankind. If the US got egg on its face in front of the whole world right when nations were barely restrained from going to war, who knows what might have come about as a result.
- It was likely a controlled and scripted presentation with a mix of pre-recorded footage from when the successful landing actually did occur combined with some live footage as well as re-created and custom-scripted scenes.
- As it was likely live elements synced in with the pieces of edited recordings, perhaps aspects of the original footage couldn't be shown, or aspects might not have occurred ideally, or possibly that some scenes would require scripting and had to be re-created via a 'set' like a movie in order to re-create some scenes as they wanted them to be presented. This would also explain the Kubrick connection, as well as the inconsistencies of why some footage seems to have elements that are out of place or inconsistent with what would be expected in reality, while most of the other footage does have those elements behaving as would be expected in reality.
- I doubt that they would have been able to rehearse most or even much of it at all beforehand, so it likely required controllers and directors for instructing the participants of when to make responses or to ask certain questions in order to keep timing and syncing between the live actions of participants, the actual landing footage, and re-created footage. (such as there being background voices in some recordings counting down/up for when to respond to a live question to try to simulate and account for distance and signal delay, etc.)
- With a mixture of original footage and re-created footage being interacted with by live participants with a script, directors and controllers, it would have appeared much like it did. You could imagine it as a sort of stage play with actors who interact with a recording on a TV (or even think Jurassic Park with "John Hammond" interacting with the recording of himself on the screen).
I pretty much see it from the same point of view
TBQH the lie behind the space race was the most likely (I have zero evidence) enormous weapons programs behind every technological advancement gained. The space race was just a convenient, believable, and generally good coverstory.
This guy writes well for a fucking retard who believes we went to the moon... you stupid fucking moron it is beyond obvious we didn't go to the fucking moon
there is a mix of truth and lie in it all.
There can never be an abundance of lies that actually counterbalance the small amount of 'truth' so as to make the truth of no significance?
>The whole space race thing was too public to easily lie about it or fake it because the rest of the world was able to verify certain aspects of the events that could not be faked.
The jews don't run the world in a monolithic way?
>The technology we gained from the moonshot program is too real to be something that they just faked on a movie set with Kubrick. The truth is a mix of reality and fictional creation
This is conjecture with little supportive evidence
I'm glad I read this. Thank you you StupidDog.
You're welcome
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZramDBFkXRU/
Link to American Moon. I didnt know half of what was contained in this documentary.
Watch this video, https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZramDBFkXRU/, and then come back and we will have an adult conversation.
Seen it before. Same talking points that have been copypasta'd for decades. When you say "adult conversation", you really mean "you tell me how I'm a shill and I am retarded for believing that the truth is something different than what either you or I think it is"? I'm not going to get suckered into your "adult conversation". I've been there with many others before you and it always ends the same. You will post me an endless list of videos to watch and tell me that if I don't watch them then my own thoughts on the matter are invalid because the video is all you have to work with. Sorry, not going there today.
An adult conversation is where you describe how the valid points in the video were incorrect and how they were incorrect instead of writing a paragraph projecting on why you are right without actually saying anything.
Moontards BTFO'd
(post is archived)