Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

681

Put aside the obvious answers like “any random person”, “so and so for the lols” and try to answer seriously.

The standard is not “better than JD Vance.” We’re aiming for “not disappointing,” which is a much higher bar.

Put aside the obvious answers like “any random person”, “so and so for the lols” and try to answer seriously. The standard is not “better than JD Vance.” We’re aiming for “not disappointing,” which is a much higher bar.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 5 pts

I'm happy with Vance all things considered.

[–] • 1 pt

You gotta keep your standards high. He has big flaws but it could have been much worse.

[–] • 0 pt

I agree, in terms of the question, it is who else would we have liked? People saying shit like David Duke is silly. There isn't any reality where that is going to happen.

[–] • 1 pt

He could have gone full redemption+alpha and put RFK to both redeem himself on the vax issue and open up the can of worms of the Secret Service, CIA and similars. RFK is less useful than Bowman, but symbolizes much more.

[–] • 1 pt

Unless he appointed a rabbi, he couldn't have picked someone who supported the jews more.

[–] • 2 pts

Who would you have preferred from the pool of candidates?