![People who constantly force religious beliefs... [500x559 - 45KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/3EiFd9.png){kind=link}
I already told you 14x I don't believe in organized religion.
I'm meant to know that the several conversations I'm having with flippant mongrels is you everytime when poal.co is bent over the foot of the bed with 'find_the_wabbit' hunt and random names?
But since you're an atheist you indulge your mental delusions as a convenient way to avoid cognitive dissonance.
There are no conflicting attitudes. There is no proof of God, I don't believe in a God. I never said there was a God, I lack the belief in the existence of God/Gods.
You are using a term you do not understand.
I understand it one way. You see, in order to believe in something, or lacking belief in something, you have to define it. If you cannot define the concept, then you cannot interact with that concept. That is your first folly. Your idea of god is that god does not exist, you base this on "proof" which you say doesn't "exist". That begs the question, what proof would satisfy the criteria to be considered definitive? If you knew, then it means you know what kind of proof you're looking for, therefore you have some idea of what god is, because you demand a particular proof, for particular validation of your particular beliefs about God. IE that god does not exist.
You think god is some fairy god father, so unless some fairy god father comes from the heavens and says "I'm God", you will remain smug in your belief that there is no god. Do you see what you have done? You have defined god as a fairy godfather. You defined god by the proof you demand that will validate your belief in god.
You have a bigger task, is god a fairy god father? Is the divine entity that is responsible for all existence bound to its creation? If it is then how can that concept of yours be god? If by definition god is ultimate reality, the supreme being, how could your limited mind create an accurate conception of such a reality? How can it when your perception is merely a blink in the life of the universe? Are you telling me that your conceptualization of god is so perfect, because you in your limited knowledge, and senses have perfect understanding of reality?
Only an atheist could be so arrogant. Remember, your religion is the one that's responsible for satanism, feminism, communism, and the corruption of organized religion, as well as transexualism. If you think your one true faith is productive, so be it, I respect your right to degenerate yourself. I seek a higher path.
You see, in order to believe in something, or lacking belief in something, you have to define it. If you cannot define the concept, then you cannot interact with that concept.
Unless of course you are dealing with philosophical concepts. Not everything needs to be tangible to be discussed.
Take the terms infinite and perpetuity, as far as we know neither of these terms are observably true. We have not seen anything that goes on forever or lasts forever, and yet we use them in conversation.
Your idea of god is that god does not exist, you base this on "proof" which you say doesn't "exist".
Prove that he exists. Don't say nature, or the compexity of life, we can prove how this came about, and it wasn't from an omnipotent watchmaker.
You have defined god as a fairy godfather
Derisively and facetious, not literally. You go on for some length about it and have been unable to make this distinction.
Remember, your religion is the one that's responsible for satanism, feminism, communism, and the corruption of organized religion, as well as transexualism.
The pernicious Jewish political movement is not the same as not believing in divine entities.
Satanism is an ideological religious counter culture. Feminism is a social movement born from Marxism. Communism is the political arm of Judaism. Trans-sexualism is an extension of Weimar perversion from continental Jewish communism.
Atheism just means I don't believe in your bs. All these things you ascribe to Atheism are actually loosely Atheism +.
All of postmodernism that we are experiencing was first trial run on the Atheist organisation in the early 2000s. Welcome to the library, we are currently 40 volumes deep in front of you, you are playing catch up. Nice to blame us though.
I seek a higher path.
Ignorance is bliss.
Take the terms infinite and perpetuity, as far as we know neither of these terms are observably true. We have not seen anything that goes on forever or lasts forever, and yet we use them in conversation.
Relative to us things outlast us making that comparison easier.
Prove that he exists. Don't say nature, or the compexity of life, we can prove how this came about, and it wasn't from an omnipotent watchmaker.
So god is a he. If you limit god to a male human, then you're asking me to prove god personified as a male human. You're limiting god to that, because that is what you're limiting the proof to. You say prove "he" exists, so you already invented god as a "he" and if "he" doesn't exist because nature isn't "he" then god doesn't exist. Yes you are that irrational. Also, we can't prove shit about how we came about, we can't make life other than by fucking.
Derisively and facetious, not literally.
Yes literally otherwise you'd be openminded to my definition of god, instead you refuse to deviate from your belief of god as "he". As in a human male.
The pernicious Jewish political movement is not the same as not believing in divine entities.
It's rooted in the same perversion of reality.
Atheism just means I don't believe in your bs.
What's my BS? I already told you I don't believe in organized religion, yet you assume all sorts of things about my beliefs, which is asinine because you're completely off the mark regarding what I understand god to be. Your atheism is the source of your arrogance, mistaking your beliefs as the one true faith, your theory over experimental reality. You confuse the map in your mind for the actual terrain.
Ignorance is bliss.
Yet you indulge your own by believing you already have everything figured out. At least you live by your mantra.
Or you know what, I'll just do the atheist thing, I'll just make up what you believe, and just roll with it, then tell you what you believe based on my own hypothesis regardless of its accuracy. Then if you disagree, I'll just double down and keep telling you what you believe so I can strawman it and feign mental superiority.
(post is archived)