That is somewhat true. Intrinsic value is based more on need and less on want and dollars are better suited for your needs.
That is somewhat true. Intrinsic value is based more on need and less on want and dollars are better suited for your needs.
It's not somewhat true, it's true, full stop. The fed can't print trillions of dollars in intrinsic value because fiat is no different that btc.
It's not somewhat true, it's true, full stop. The fed can't print trillions of dollars in intrinsic value because fiat is no different that btc.
So you believe that the meteoric rise in the "value" of bitcoin is not just like printing money?
So you believe that the meteoric rise in the "value" of bitcoin is ***not*** just like printing money?
This is my last reply
So you believe that the meteoric rise in the "value" of bitcoin is not just like printing money?
There's is a finite supply bitcoin, it's rise is due to its scarcity. It's literally the opposite of printing money and I think you know that. So I'm going to downvote the troll and move on.
This is my last reply
>So you believe that the meteoric rise in the "value" of bitcoin is not just like printing money?
There's is a finite supply bitcoin, it's rise is due to its scarcity. It's literally the opposite of printing money and I think you know that. So I'm going to downvote the troll and move on.
(post is archived)