… that’s what I’ve been saying?
No one is going to spend every dollar they make on bullets. If you have more bullets than the majority of people in your area, have fun gambling on crypto in the meantime because if shtf you’ll be among the ‘wealthiest.’ The majority of what you can spend your money on is going to be useless if society falls that far anyway, so it makes no sense to say that anyone shouldn’t buy crypto because eventually we might be living like mad max
You can have all the bullets you want, if millions of retards killed 90% of wild animals to eat, what are you going to extract from them at gun point? Their meat? You want to go cannibal?
I mean imagine, hunting is regulated for a reason
Your point makes more sense now but I don’t think you’re being realistic about how it would play out. For sure, the day the power goes out, millions of plushy people aren’t going to move into the mountains and start killing their food.
Everyone in sparsely populated areas would thrive for awhile, everyone in the cities would fight and kill each other for whatever food and supplies remained in the area. Eventually the cities would be depleted and the few survivors would move to areas with more options for food, fighting and killing would continue until there were few enough people left alive to survive on what’s available.
There would be substantially fewer humans, but ecosystems balance out when every creature is [essentially] feral. The humans most likely to survive are the ones that started with the most bullets
"If I kill my neighbor, there will be more for me..."
That's a train of thought that isn't going to happen just in the cities, IMO
It's only for industrial farming if some 380 million people can be fed everyday, while I didn't do the math for wild animals, I bet it's far below that
Take france for instance, it's a big agricultural country
>France is the largest EU agri- cultural producer (23 percent of the value of EU-15 agricultural production), followed by Germany and Italy (both at about 15 percent), Spain (12 percent), United Kingdom (9 percent), and the Netherlands (7 percent).
Well with its own agricultural production alone, if memory serves, it can only feed around 40% of the population (65ish million)
So imagine with wild animals only...
(post is archived)