Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

553

I've also heard of the Assumption of Mary, but I didn't realize that was the belief she was taken body and soul into heaven. I guess the pope just decided this in the 1950s.

They also believed she never sinned, ever. Impossible. Only God is this infallible.

I've also heard of the Assumption of Mary, but I didn't realize that was the belief she was taken body and soul into heaven. I guess the pope just decided this in the 1950s. They also believed she never sinned, ever. Impossible. Only God is this infallible.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (49).
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Correct. At this time, consecrated virgins were very common. What really drew me to the EOC was their view on Israel. How they do not bend their knee to the jews and how they destroy the ethnostate of Satan that was founded by the Rothschilds in 1948. When they say Israel there, they’re saying the people of God. The church.

The Orthodox Church does not believe the modern state of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. In Scripture, Israel means the people of God, not a political country. Ancient Israel was a nation only about a century, a thousand years before Christ. The state founded in 1948 came nearly two thousand years after His death and has nothing to do with salvation history.

God’s promises were fulfilled in Christ. The Church is the true Israel, a continuation. Prophecy is fulfilled in the person of Jesus, not in the founding of a modern nation. There is no blessing for them.

The jews highjacked the Bible, stole the name and the evangelicals ran with it.

Fixed for a minor, but important correction.

[–] • 1 pt

I have to explore a bit more how and WHY some Christians believe they have to support everything Israel does. I don't agree with that but need to know how they came to that conclusion. I don't know where the start with research, but will just keep a look out for when info crosses my path.

[–] • 0 pt

Evangelicals support the state of Israel because their theology is built on something called dispensationalism. It came out of the 1800s and teaches that God has two separate plans—one for Israel and one for the Church. They believe the Jews are still God’s chosen people in a national sense and that modern Israel is part of end-times prophecy. So when Israel was founded in 1948, they saw it as a sign of the second coming.

But this view never existed in Christianity until recently. The early Church, including the apostles and Church Fathers, always taught that Christ fulfilled the promises to Israel. The Church is the continuation of Israel, not a replacement, but a fulfillment. That’s why Orthodox Christians don’t see the modern state as having any spiritual significance. It’s just another nation, created by politics, not prophecy.

So the fanatic support comes from a flawed, modern interpretation that would’ve been completely foreign to the apostles and every Christian for the first 1800 years of the faith.

[–] • 1 pt

Thank you. Great summary. Yes, I still disagree with the blanket support of anything Israel does, and there's no basis in Christianity to do that judging from your summary.