I did have a look. You have about 48 speakers listed - about half of them don't even look to have PhDs. It's not a scientific conference, it's a sham. That's what attempted corporate corruption of science looks like - if you'd been to any scientific conferences you wouldn't find it convincing.
I suggest you look up a real climate science conference and compare.
about half of them don't even look to have PhDs. It's not a scientific conference, it's a sham.
lol, you sure do have a PhD at virtue signaling and kike narrative pushing.
Go back to sleep, everything is fine.
I'm sorry about your ignorance, but scientists have PhDs.
Still you are ignoring the other half who has one and make a valid point in saying that GW and CC are fake narratives.
You are so delusional, it's sad.
(post is archived)