The thing is eating meat is unnecessary (for anyone with access to a grocery store).
How can an environmentalist claim to be one if they contribute to animal agriculture? Animal ag is responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, more than the combined exhaust from all transportation.
They are contributing to the worst thing for the environment when they don't need to.
Ok so what if they eat meat not sourced via animal agriculture? That should be fine then, right?
Environmentally, yeah that's fine. I agree. Nice loophole
Loophole? What im suggesting certainly isnt abnormal....that an ardent environmentalist would also be a hunter?
Im not showing you a loophole. Im showing you why your assertion is false. You can be an environmentalist even if you're not vegan.
(post is archived)