From earlier:
from their site The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only and is the opinion of individual reviewers for Media Bias/Fact Check
so they admit its opinion. How is that a fact check?
... and now you're saying
My point is there isn't an objective media bias rating site, it doesn't exist, I don't know if it can exist because everyone has a bias.
Meanwhile you're also saying that fact checking is so easy...
You're coming across as pretty muddled, and I have other stuff I need to do.
Now who is being clueless? Come on I'm saying you can't trust some faceless entity to check facts for you. You have to check yourself.
What is guaranteed is that you only have time to fact check a small number of issues yourself, and many people don't have the intellectual faculties to do it anyway. Perhaps the obviously impractical 'you have to do it yourself' stance is convenient for the anti-science conspiracy theory nonsense that people enjoy so much around here.
Fact check sites have competent people collecting info and sources for everyone else, and explaining exactly why they came to a particular conclusion, saving everyone else a lot of time. If your ideology rejects fact checking, maybe it means yours ideology is founded on bullshit.
Now hold the bus there, now I just specifically said my “ideology” is based on fact checking myself. Taking what someone else tells you as a fact check is not fact checking and should be called what it is.
Why would someone want you too accept what they say as fact and not look for yourself? Because that have an ideology to push.
(post is archived)