Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

790

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now.

Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales.

“We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically not to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators.

None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice.

EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code."

I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now. Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales. “We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically *not* to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators. None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice. EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630 Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code." I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (44).
[–] • 0 pt

I mean, my own mother is a nurse and just like many doctors, she just takes what the CDC says as gospel and operates under that premise. You can't put people in jail for that.

It falls under “just following orders” when they see the outcomes, don’t try anything different and know they get extra money for the hospital/s for following orders for the deaths.

After the first few months other methods of treatment should’ve been tried. They removed “the right to try”, even went to court to stop ivermectin and hcq for patients/family demanding it. They also left people to die with no visitors. They already knew the moment the patient walked into the hospital the steps to kill them for extra profit that the government outlined. They were going to die but never even tried anything different, questioned or resisted, they just went along with the orders and knew the outcomes.

They all knew what was going on, that’s why my brother as a director of a major medical system resigned along with many doctors, nurses and the researchers they had on staff. They wanted no part of the crimes going on. It was that blatant to anyone with a half working brain and they knew it was criminal and left after fighting to do more.

Then you get to the jab, after the first couple months nurses/doctors/pharmacists knew there were major issues with it, they saw it first hand but kept jabbing and still push it.

[–] • 0 pt

That’s just the thing, not everyone knew or even still knows what’s going on. My mother is still convinced that the jab has value in so far as “minimizing symptoms” from an infection. When pressed about the “died suddenly” stuff, she reverts to data put out by the government…which as we all know is heavily massaged.

She’s not an evil person, she’s just bewitched. She certainly respects my right not to get the jab if I don’t want it and was always against the mandates.

My point is that we need to distinguish between people who were (and still are fooled), and those who have actual power to implement draconian policies and actual did those things.

I guarantee that if my mother believed what we believe, she would have done the same as your brother.

It’s willful ignorance at worst. But that is very different than what the likes of Fauci, the FDA, and Biden have done here.