Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now.

Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales.

“We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically not to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators.

None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice.

EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code."

I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now. Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales. “We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically *not* to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators. None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice. EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630 Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code." I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (44).
[–] • 1 pt

No, it's actually two years past the time.

[–] • 2 pts

Did you read the shit.. wait until you get to the part where he states his “motivation” for writing the letter….

I may actually make a video where I read this shit and retort to every single disgusting thing in it. For some reason, this has me fucking fuming tonight.

[–] • 0 pt

I read it. Nobody wants to know how I feel about the entire Covid scam, because it's very dark. I want people to die for this. It's the only way there will be even a shadow of justice.

[–] • 0 pt

I think you’re in good company. Justice would definitely be death penalty for crimes against humanity…after a fair trial by military tribunal, of course.

[–] • 0 pt

He said democracy also, I’m tired of that word from the left. Any public figure using that word should be immediately fired and imprisoned until they can fully recite the Declaration of Independence, the bill of rights and also tell us the difference between a democracy vs republic.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Wouldn't that be like a demon drinking holy water?