WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now.

Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales.

“We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically not to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators.

None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice.

EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code."

I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

Lots of things I take issue with in this letter. Too many to list and I’m too tired to do it right now. Let’s just say it sounds like a bunch of crocodile tears and these fuckers still don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the severity of what they supported and, therefore, the severity of the justice that needs to be imposed upon them to rebalance the scales. “We’re sorry” isn’t going to cut it, not by a mile. No, there needs to be military tribunals to punish blatant, overt human rights violations. God, and even we can forgive, but lady justice’s job is specifically *not* to forgive, but rather to take an eye for an eye and offer restitution at the expense of the criminal perpetrators. None of this shit will even begin to approach the possibility of “being OK” until justice is served, and an “apology” for this shit - even if genuine (which this is not) - will never serve as a sufficient replacement for justice. EDIT: The comments in the actual referenced article are pure gold and definitely worth reading: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630 Lot's of talk about "justice" and "human rights" and "Nuremberg code." I think the public sentiment is getting where it needs to be, slowly but surely.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

lmao I missed this part.

The people who actually enacted policy are the criminals.. all the others were just useful idiots.

His mom is a useful idiot lmao and should be absolved, only the top people she be punished not the ones who could see what was happening “on the ground” and continued to comply because they were used.

I don’t think that excuse worked at the sham trials at Nuremberg.

[–] 0 pt

I do not agree that she should be absolved.

Even a cursory search at the time, like looking at the listed side effects in the data sheet inside the vax boxes, which were completely blank.

Her only excuse is I was following orders, but we all know that excuse does not fly in the midst of a genocide.

[–] 1 pt

I fully agree. That’s why I put the “good jew” quote in my other reply. Not just the vaxxes, they knew the treatments weren’t working, wouldn’t try anything else even if a patient or family demanded and knew the hospitals were getting extra money.

Guilty!!

[–] 0 pt

They made treatments that do work illegal!!