They seem like gatekeepers. They are trying to say that excess deaths were due to alcohol consumption and "coinfection". They start off trying to add weight to their statements by stating how long they have been doing statistics. Who cares who they are? There was no statement of excess death comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated. This fact is telling. If they are reading this, "tamp" means to stamp, press down or suppress. Tamp down is a common English term so I guess English may not be your first language.
They also go on to state that they have no hard direct evidence. That's true, no one has really done any studies on why and the organizations that should be doing it aren't - as he also pointed out.
Observation says that that happened because of this, but that's also a fallacy. Whatever the outcome, the drug companies and their lapdogs got their money out of the mess, and now no one cares about you or I.
Zakly
Always best to read the article before commenting.
Ad-hominem attacks are so juvenile. You can't dispute my observations so you make a weak personal attack. I did read the article and the authors trying to blame alcohol for the continuing excess covid vaccine related deaths is so weak, it is laughable.
If you had bothered to read the article you would know that the scientists analysed the data available, making clear that they were merely analysing the data available, and only the data available, and then relaying what they had found with the clear caveat that they were not drawing any further conclusions, since, as they made clear, their role as scientists precluded them from drawing any secure wide-ranging conclusions owing to the limited nature of the data available.
(post is archived)