Always best to read the article before commenting.
Ad-hominem attacks are so juvenile. You can't dispute my observations so you make a weak personal attack. I did read the article and the authors trying to blame alcohol for the continuing excess covid vaccine related deaths is so weak, it is laughable.
If you had bothered to read the article you would know that the scientists analysed the data available, making clear that they were merely analysing the data available, and only the data available, and then relaying what they had found with the clear caveat that they were not drawing any further conclusions, since, as they made clear, their role as scientists precluded them from drawing any secure wide-ranging conclusions owing to the limited nature of the data available.
They attempted to blame alcohol and some nebulous excuse "coinfection" for the excess deaths. It is a clear attempt at obfuscating the truth that the vaccine itself is the primary and overwhelming cause of excess mortality. This is gatekeeping at its worse. Who pays them?
(post is archived)