Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

849

Because there can be an infinite number of NFTs. And maybe there's only so many of the one you put money into; but it's still floating in a sea, and as others come to the forefront, yours will drop in popularity and will be submerged, likely forever.

Because there can be an infinite number of NFTs. And maybe there's only so many of the one you put money into; but it's still floating in a sea, and as others come to the forefront, yours will drop in popularity and will be submerged, likely forever.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Both you and your brother are retards. You're arguing on the lie that the (((NFT))) has value when it doesn't.

[–] • 0 pt

It's not impossible for NFTs to have real value, if they're constructed that way. They have a huge amount of potential.

It's one thing for an artist to issue an NFT that's merely a a "print" of an image, stored on a webserver and that can be accessed by anyone for free. But what if, for instance, the NFT also included a license to use that art commercially?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

No. No. No.

(((NFTs))) are jewish by definition. They aren't an object, they can't hold value. It's not possible. You probably think (((rcyptocurrency))) is good, which isn't shocking but is disturbing AF that so many people who think they're pilled trust a jewish system of (((digital currency))). And even further a jewish system of (((digital assets))). (((NFTs))) are made up, hold no value, are of no creation, cause no creation etc. They aren't assets. They're the realized form of money laundering. jews have 'nouned' the 'verb' of "money laundering" and you've fallen for it because you're retarded.

e;

But what if, for instance, the NFT also included a license to use that art commercially?

(((copyright))) (((license))) And why / how would that stop me from seeing that totally cool (((NFT))) being used on some webpage and taking it for myself. Thus making it fungible, copied, now mine and not just whoever has the (((license))).

You are a fucking meme of a predditor. Go back.

[–] • 1 pt

Cryptocurrency investor: Wasting money on NFTs as investments? Wow, do you believe in the tooth fairy too?

NFT investor: Yeah, I get you're point. I should instead believe in Santa Claus like you do.

Cryptocurrency investor: Finally you're making sense! Now let me show you the hottest new coin that everyone is pumping up this week.

[–] • 1 pt

Asset backed NFT's would be a better choice. Only a few of those just yet.

[–] • 0 pt

Check out ICOSA. It's complicated but it's a financial nft not a jpeg or some stupid thing you wear in a game.

[–] • 0 pt

How on Earth would that be better? That would be hilariously worse. An (((NFT))) is something liek a screenshot of a picture of a magazine's first printing. You own that? Let me see it!!! [Prnt Scr] I OWN THAT.

You're incredibly retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

There is always a new waiting for victims.

[–] • 0 pt

NFTs in those virtual lands might be something.

[–] • 0 pt

Financial nfts are the only real value holding type and they just coming out now. See ICOSA

[–] • 0 pt

Sell nfts don't buy them.

There's a lot of money laundering and other shit going on. If you aren't truly in on it, don't do it.

It's a big club and you ain't in it - George Carlin.

Maybe look into fungible tokens. The order books are thin on an NFT,. Making it hard to find it's true value. If a fungible token is recognized it's value will be true and have full order books, and high volume.

[–] • 0 pt

its not a bad thing to do as a hail mary hedge but to call it an investment is fucking retarded go invest in a lottery ticket you might have more luck

[–] • 0 pt

I remember reading a comment where their buddy had invested in bitcoin early and cashed out with something like $200,000. He dumped it into an NFT that is now worth $400.