WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Because there can be an infinite number of NFTs. And maybe there's only so many of the one you put money into; but it's still floating in a sea, and as others come to the forefront, yours will drop in popularity and will be submerged, likely forever.

Because there can be an infinite number of NFTs. And maybe there's only so many of the one you put money into; but it's still floating in a sea, and as others come to the forefront, yours will drop in popularity and will be submerged, likely forever.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No. No. No.

(((NFTs))) are jewish by definition. They aren't an object, they can't hold value. It's not possible. You probably think (((rcyptocurrency))) is good, which isn't shocking but is disturbing AF that so many people who think they're pilled trust a jewish system of (((digital currency))). And even further a jewish system of (((digital assets))). (((NFTs))) are made up, hold no value, are of no creation, cause no creation etc. They aren't assets. They're the realized form of money laundering. jews have 'nouned' the 'verb' of "money laundering" and you've fallen for it because you're retarded.

e;

But what if, for instance, the NFT also included a license to use that art commercially?

(((copyright))) (((license))) And why / how would that stop me from seeing that totally cool (((NFT))) being used on some webpage and taking it for myself. Thus making it fungible, copied, now mine and not just whoever has the (((license))).

You are a fucking meme of a predditor. Go back.