WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

It is cruel to kill an animal that doesn't want to die. It is unnecessary cruelty.

[Going vegan doesn't make you a pussy, Nimai Delgado,](https://kek.gg/i/6THsnY.jpeg) [and world record holding vegan strongman Patrik Baboumian](https://kek.gg/i/FfdY_.jpg) It is cruel to kill an animal that doesn't want to die. It is unnecessary cruelty. [Vegan diets are nutritionally adequate](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562864/)

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

kill yourself faggot.

[–] 0 pt

I think I have to disagree with your premise as most of the animals killed for food wouldn’t exist if not for that purpose. So is it worse to have some kind of life than none at all? If we didn’t eat meat chickens and cows would virtually go extinct. Isn’t that genocide? We domesticated these animals so now we have some responsibility to maintain their population.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

That's a good point, but I'd ask you to map in onto a human context to see if it still seems moral. Say we were raising and killing humans for food. These humans wouldn't exist otherwise. Is it moral to do this?

Of course, there are confounding variables. For example, animals aren't as intelligent as humans. But, say again, we raise and kill retard humans for food. They wouldn't exist otherwise. Is this moral?

[–] 0 pt

Men are raised to be livestock. No men no taxes. Is that moral? My view is that morality really doesn’t factor into life in the grand scheme of things. Unless society drastically changes morality isn’t gonna happen on a grand scale. We do what’s needed to survive and continue our species. If you attempt to factor morality in the species eventually dies which in and of itself is immoral. I think the disconnect we are having here is you are arguing that there is inherent morality in life and I don’t believe that to be the case. I think we as humans have to create morality by choosing what does the least harm. I choose to eat animals because I believe that creates the least harm you take the opposite approach there isn’t a way to prove either position is correct at least not with the data we have.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt