maybe rockets require less of this mysterious energy eastward because the distance is an illusion. since we assume that the earth is flat and stationary, but it appears like if it was a spinning globe from relative observation, i assume there is a force that creates the illusion of the rotation, the same force makes the same observer believe that the rocket is flying east when it actually isnt.
independent amateur and civilian groups who shoot rockets, you made that up. nasa is shit and the equator confirms nothing. everything confirms the illusion only because you refuse to think ouside of the "box"
Are you even aware there are amateur high power rocketry groups? Are you aware of all the commercial rocketry groups? They can accurately calculate the required fuel (input energy) based on launch orientation. Eastward requires least fuel. Polar requires middle. Westward require the same additional delta-v as calculated for the earth's rotation at the given relative position to the equator.
Btw, rockets are not required. It's simply easiest to observe because the numbers are so big. Any large ballistic trajectory can confirm this (e.g. artillery). It's just that the confirmation uses smaller numbers.
There's nothing mysterious about kinetic energy. It's well understood and a hallmark of physics.
Care to try again?
well their measurements are flawed, if the earth is flat, then all their GPS equipment is based on a lie.
I can agree with that. Again, implies globe.
(post is archived)