Globeheads don't get it
Globeheads don't get it
Yep, it’s a fact. But most are too conditioned to realise.
Yep, it’s a fact. But most are too conditioned to realise.
the shape doesn't matter, since noone can just take a picture/video of it. What matters is: _WE_ are the middle of the so called "universe", not just some monkey ascendants on a "average planet".
“The human race is just a chemical scum on a moderate-sized planet, orbiting around a very average star in the outer suburb of one among a hundred billion galaxies. We are so insignificant that I can't believe the whole universe exists for our benefit. That would be like saying that you would disappear if I closed my eyes.”
crippled shoepuppet Stephen Hawking
the shape doesn't matter, since noone can just take a picture/video of it. What matters is: _WE_ are the middle of the so called "universe", not just some monkey ascendants on a "average planet".
“The human race is just a chemical scum on a moderate-sized planet, orbiting around a very average star in the outer suburb of one among a hundred billion galaxies. We are so insignificant that I can't believe the whole universe exists for our benefit. That would be like saying that you would disappear if I closed my eyes.”
crippled shoepuppet Stephen Hawking
the air gets thinner as you go higher, once you cant detect any more gas pressure then youre in space. or maybe it is is the point where aircrafts wings fail to provide enough lift.
the air gets thinner as you go higher, once you cant detect any more gas pressure then youre in space. or maybe it is is the point where aircrafts wings fail to provide enough lift.
And you are literally retarded
And you are literally retarded
What keeps atmosphere from all spilling over the edge?
Why do rockets launched eastward require less energy?
What keeps atmosphere from all spilling over the edge?
Why do rockets launched eastward require less energy?
What keeps atmosphere from all spilling over the edge?
The dome theory would solve this. I could ask you why the atmosphere isn't stripped away by the vacuum of space?
Why do rockets launched eastward require less energy?
Do they? NASA doesn't count as a reliable source of information. Their 60 million dollar per day budget gives them a huge incentive to say whatever they need to say to keep the money flowing.
Disclaimer I'm not a "flat earther" because I'm not 100% confident in either model I just find the topic extremely interesting. Don't get your panties in a twist at my questions
>What keeps atmosphere from all spilling over the edge?
The dome theory would solve this. I could ask you why the atmosphere isn't stripped away by the vacuum of space?
>Why do rockets launched eastward require less energy?
Do they? NASA doesn't count as a reliable source of information. Their 60 million dollar per day budget gives them a huge incentive to say whatever they need to say to keep the money flowing.
Disclaimer I'm not a "flat earther" because I'm not 100% confident in either model I just find the topic extremely interesting. Don't get your panties in a twist at my questions
The dome theory would solve this.
Is that the fe position? Plane surrounded by a dome isolating us from space? Guess no space. What's on the other side of the dome? What attaches the dome to the plane? Doesn't this imply something about dome builders?
I could ask you why the atmosphere isn't stripped away by the vacuum of space?
It is. But gravity and natural replacement rates outpace the loss. Enter atomic weights, ionosphere, magnetosphere, and so on. Which in turn also explains weather, wind, and even many climate factors.
Do they?
Yes. Nasa is not required for any of this. At this point there are enough amateurs and civilian groups that this fact is confirmed. In fact, high end shooting computers now take direction into account for this very reason. The physics is solid and endlessly confirmed without nasa. Btw, shooting computers also account for precession and locations relative to the equator (confirming a spinning globe).
As for twists, I'm just curious as to the thinking behind the fe. One would think there are basic questions which address significant factors of each. Yet no one seems to be able to support the fe theory with anything more than superficial, "can't use x as source, therefore it must be valid."
Not that i'm throwing stones your way. Simply explaining your statement appears programmed.
> The dome theory would solve this.
Is that the fe position? Plane surrounded by a dome isolating us from space? Guess no space. What's on the other side of the dome? What attaches the dome to the plane? Doesn't this imply something about dome builders?
> I could ask you why the atmosphere isn't stripped away by the vacuum of space?
It is. But gravity and natural replacement rates outpace the loss. Enter atomic weights, ionosphere, magnetosphere, and so on. Which in turn also explains weather, wind, and even many climate factors.
> Do they?
Yes. Nasa is not required for any of this. At this point there are enough amateurs and civilian groups that this fact is confirmed. In fact, high end shooting computers now take direction into account for this very reason. The physics is solid and endlessly confirmed without nasa. Btw, shooting computers also account for precession and locations relative to the equator (confirming a spinning globe).
As for twists, I'm just curious as to the thinking behind the fe. One would think there are basic questions which address significant factors of each. Yet no one seems to be able to support the fe theory with anything more than superficial, "can't use x as source, therefore it must be valid."
Not that i'm throwing stones your way. Simply explaining your statement appears programmed.
I have no idea if a dome is certified flat earth. Like I said I don't carry the card. But yes, a dome would demand a dome builder and this is a "leap of faith" (in quotes because there is plenty of evidence for a creator so calling it faith seems a little silly but I digress) that causes many people to get off the bus at this point.
Then we both exchange evidence and eventually reach another leap of faith when you say "But that would require a bunch of people participating in the lie!" And again more people get off the bus. You're either willing to believe it or you aren't and nobody can do anything to change that for you.
I'm not sure why doubting an agency that has a billion dollar incentive to lie seems "programmed" to you. I'm now doubting that this conversation is going anywhere fruitful. You seem too eager to brush the whole thing aside. I would challenge you with more robust arguments of flat earth but I don't want to come off as being overly committed to that model so I'll just recommend that you hit up bitchute and do your own research. Good luck
I have no idea if a dome is certified flat earth. Like I said I don't carry the card. But yes, a dome would demand a dome builder and this is a "leap of faith" (in quotes because there is plenty of evidence for a creator so calling it faith seems a little silly but I digress) that causes many people to get off the bus at this point.
Then we both exchange evidence and eventually reach another leap of faith when you say "But that would require a bunch of people participating in the lie!" And again more people get off the bus. You're either willing to believe it or you aren't and nobody can do anything to change that for you.
I'm not sure why doubting an agency that has a billion dollar incentive to lie seems "programmed" to you. I'm now doubting that this conversation is going anywhere fruitful. You seem too eager to brush the whole thing aside. I would challenge you with more robust arguments of flat earth but I don't want to come off as being overly committed to that model so I'll just recommend that you hit up bitchute and do your own research. Good luck
maybe rockets require less of this mysterious energy eastward because the distance is an illusion. since we assume that the earth is flat and stationary, but it appears like if it was a spinning globe from relative observation, i assume there is a force that creates the illusion of the rotation, the same force makes the same observer believe that the rocket is flying east when it actually isnt.
independent amateur and civilian groups who shoot rockets, you made that up. nasa is shit and the equator confirms nothing. everything confirms the illusion only because you refuse to think ouside of the "box"
maybe rockets require less of this mysterious energy eastward because the distance is an illusion. since we assume that the earth is flat and stationary, but it appears like if it was a spinning globe from relative observation, i assume there is a force that creates the illusion of the rotation, the same force makes the same observer believe that the rocket is flying east when it actually isnt.
independent amateur and civilian groups who shoot rockets, you made that up. nasa is shit and the equator confirms nothing. everything confirms the illusion only because you refuse to think ouside of the "box"
Lol. I'm very sincere. I'm legit curious how committed you are to all this. These are legitimate questions.
As they are legitimate questions, please provide answers.
Noted your demeaning 'jr' comment acknowledged your fear and defensive posture. Accordingly, please note, I'm simply asking questions to better understand your position in how you believe things work. Honestly curious.
Lol. I'm very sincere. I'm legit curious how committed you are to all this. These are legitimate questions.
As they are legitimate questions, please provide answers.
Noted your demeaning 'jr' comment acknowledged your fear and defensive posture. Accordingly, please note, I'm simply asking questions to better understand your position in how you believe things work. Honestly curious.
if you are intelligent and you have really curiosity you will be ok..Im not a teacher, only a provoker
if you are intelligent and you have really curiosity you will be ok..Im not a teacher, only a provoker
Since we aren't even at Type 1 of Kardashev's planetary civilization ratings it's only logical to think we are in a giant kikes snow globe.
Since we aren't even at Type 1 of Kardashev's planetary civilization ratings it's only logical to think we are in a giant kikes snow globe.
(post is archived)