Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

It's not even close.

It's not even close.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts
  1. Worked less hours than you -Bullshit. They worked sunup to sundown.
  2. Likely had a bigger house than you. -Not likely. They may have had a bigger house, but they'd have 7 or 8 kids to help with labor. There's a difference.
  3. Had longer vacations than you -Bullshit.The fuck they did.Their "days off" would have been spent going to church for holy obligation days.
  4. Definitely had higher T. -Debatable. No such study or data exists.
  5. Ate better food than you. -Not likely. Eating potatoes, beets and turnips with 3oz of ox meat or chicken once a day isn't "eating better". Sometimes they didn't eat at all, depending on last season's harvest.
  6. Paid way less taxes. -Bullshit. Local King or Prince: "I've decided I need a new country estate. Guess I'll have my militia and my knights go take ANOTHER half of the peasants' crops as taxes this year. Because fuck them. I can. I'm divinely ordained. By God."
  7. Rarely saw their boss. -This one is true.
[–] • 3 pts

Just fuck off with the cope. Nothing you state is remotely close to accurate. They worked long hours rarely during the year, on days they worked they got MANY long breaks not some 15 minute pittance. You think they had children to help with labor? Okay kike. They had children to raise and become men and ladies. They had entire seasons off, they had no serious taxes that would ruin them and could live very well off of little work. What they ate was objectively food. What you eat is most-likely not. Unless you raise and slaughter your animals you're eating some for of judaism. "They totally paid more taxes." Here you are again ignoring history. The US was founded due to a 3% (I think) tax o n tea. They paid nearly ZERO taxes.

[–] • 2 pts

Worked less hours than you -Bullshit. They worked sunup to sundown

Newsflash buddy, that IS less hours than a lot of workers in modern society.

Likely had a bigger house than you. -Not likely. They may have had a bigger house, but they'd have 7 or 8 kids to help with labor. There's a difference

Oh that must have been terrible having so many kids to carry on your legacy and stick up for each other once you're gone. People should obviously only be having one kid and three cats like people today.

Had longer vacations than you -Bullshit.The fuck they did

Yeah Idk where they're getting that. Pretty sure the concept of a vacation wasn't even a thing until Henry Ford (or maybe it was Hitler).

Definitely had higher T. -Debatable. No such study or data exists

There is no study on that because they didn't know about hormones back then and that's not something that preserves well. But it's pretty obvious they did. Life was harsh back then and only nobility could survive as a weak Nancy boy.

Eating potatoes, beets and turnips with 3oz of ox meat or chicken once a day isn't "eating better"

Yes, actually. It is.

Paid way less taxes. -Bullshit. Local King or Prince: "I've decided I need a new country estate. Guess I'll have my militia and my knights go take ANOTHER half of the peasants' crops as taxes this year. Because fuck them. I can. I'm divinely ordained. By God."

Sometimes this sort of thing happened yes. And it happens today. There's eminent domain and civil asset forfeiture. Other times they did pay less taxes.

Medieval peasants had it hard in a lot of ways. People could die from infection from pretty minor injuries, infant mortality was very high etc. But we do have it worse in a few ways and those new hardships are imposed deliberately by a rootless international clique.

[–] • 1 pt

There is no study on that because they didn't know about hormones back then and that's not something that preserves well. But it's pretty obvious they did. Life was harsh back then and only nobility could survive as a weak Nancy boy.

Go just 20 years back and T levels in males is significnatly lower now than then. In Medieval times there is no doubt in my mind that a 40 year old man was higher than a 17 year old now, and a male at 17 years old is peak T level of his life.

[–] • 3 pts

I have fields for you to work off you want to fulfill your dream of being my indentured servant

[–] • 2 pts

This lunatic getting off that keyboard might clean up his reasoning a bit, and get better crops following season

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

In those times, most peasents were voluntary slaves. And, yes, they did live better lives than you and I. The difference was they knew whom they served. And those leaders weren't completely debased devil worshipping faggots like most world leaders today.

[–] • 0 pt

Peasants weren't the same as serfs.

[–] • 0 pt

Despite the (((lies))) about history and how these peasants were treated - they weren't treated poorly - they served a purpose. They got significant protection from the army of the time (knights etc).

[–] • 1 pt

We're currently in the jew created nigger ages

[–] • 1 pt

The jCnA?

[–] • 0 pt

Property taxes literally promote living in the shitiest smallest abode you'll tolerate and endure.

Who the fuck designs a system like that?

At the bare minimal, only tax the value of the land not the property on it. That way people aren't penalized for having nicer and bigger homes.

[–] • 2 pts

jews

[–] • -1 pt

Obviously someone so greedy and stupid / short sighted they couldN'T care less.

[–] • 0 pt

...and the doctors would try to help you by bleeding you with leeches. They were fucking up back than too, but at least a leech wouldn't give you myocarditis.

[–] • 1 pt

There weren't NEARLY as many deadly diseases / ailments then though. Mostly because people had functioning immune systems and healthy bodies.

[–] • 1 pt

Wrong. Mostly because people didn't transfer illnesses from one lonely corner of the world to another. Without a doubt, people had to deal with way less poisoning for several reasons back then. But this doesn't prove peoples immune system was better back then.

[–] • 0 pt

I it literally does. Salmonella, White a thing, want a thing that mattered. Ecoli, the pork one etc. Because humans immune systems functioned. Raw meat was perfectly safe, a bit of dirt was fine.

[–] • 0 pt

And that's wrong why? Leeches lower blood pressure, doctors now prescribe blood thinners for that, why do you trust (((modern medicine))) more? Probably the same reason people believe the holocaust lie

[–] • 0 pt

It's odd. Life pretty much consisted of work only. Like after the sun went down people switched TV on, grabbed a beer and relaxed? This is just stupid. From our point of view life and society surely were a lot simpler, but I bet not easier at all. Get a cold or some other illness that can be treated nowadays? Oh, looks you have to die because there's no treatment. Oh, it was the blacksmith who died? O oh, problems stacking up. Or you believe the earth isn't the center of the universe? Burn you shall. Oh and you forgot the aristocracy and therefor the leading class was a bunch of pedophiles and genetic dead ends and their slaves had to follow their rules. Anyway the comparison is somewhat interesting, but this post should be relocated from /facts to /whatever, because those are claims only and kind of hard to prove and hence hard to find conclusions on. I get the point though: life should be as easy as back then, so decisionmaking gets very simple again. We might get back there, when certain peolpe get what they want and start a nuclear war.

[–] • 0 pt

Nice jewish outtake on White history. Anything negative you stated was jewish, through and through. But you're just blanket ascribing them in a general manner to White societies.

For example;

The leading class were pedos...

Never once in history were White noble families pedos at large or as a matter-of-fact.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Your stupidity glows. Aristocracy was a mixture between all the houses in europe. You call white what you like, but the truth might shock even you. Aristokids got like medieval aids or shit, because they got abused by those in power. The abuse lead to psych misbehavior or lunacy. Some time ago I read about young prince in Portugal who got raped as a kid, got those sicknesses but ruled meanwhile being an abused and ill kid.

Ed: you stupid fuck downvote for disagreeing. That might be why you got that shiny grey NPC sticker to your name. You fucking nuts, man (or woman)

[–] • 0 pt

  1. False. 12 hours per day, 6 days per week was common for non-farming wokers. For farmers, planting, harvesting and weeding was also a 6 day per week job, sun-up to sun-down, except for winter, see below.

  2. Non-farmers often got no vacations. Farmers did get nice long vacations freezing in their homes, again, see below.

  3. A few farmers did have a bigger house than you do; they usually had to build them themselves, though. They were less livable though. Most peasants preferred smaller houses because they were a lot easier to heat during the winter.

  4. True.

  5. A lot was much fresher than you'd get nowadays, at least part of the year. The rest, well, storing it in a root cellar without freezing or proper canning made it less so. Also look up the meaning of "carnival". I'd rate this mostly false.

  6. Depends on your definition of "taxes". Serfs would often pay 1/3 to 1/2 of their harvest in order to work the land. This could be considered taxes or rent. City workers were subject to guilds as well as taxes.

  7. Somewhat true, depending on the definition of "boss" and the way the area was governed.