Their sexual capital is depleted by about 40. After that, they have very little to offer a man. Of course, this applies to women who were brainwashed into believing the feminist lie. I generally recommend looking for a traditional wife in Slavic countries where they haven't been as indoctrinated into believing the lies. They also tend to be smarter too.
So women have very little to offer a man besides sex?
But if you only consider a woman worthwhile if she cranks up your libido, how does marriage fix that?
Nature intentionally makes BOTH men and women less sexually attractive as they get older, so they'll stick around and raise the kids. That's when a healthy relationship turns to supporting each other and sharing responsibilities. It can be lovely. But only if the man is a responsible adult too. You don't come across as being one.
So women have very little to offer a man besides sex?
It depends. If you like her to be brainwashed by liberalism and vote for Fuck Joe Biden, have a "career," outside the home, watch Talmudviision, have no children and cats, then, yea, she'll have value, I suppose.
I prefer a traditional woman who understands her part in society and is a partner: not some loud feminist.
Honestly, if a woman isn't married and pumping out kids by 20-25 there's something very broken with her. Extreme red flag. These days it's literally a minimum of three kids required to ensure continuation of your genetic line. If they are not hitting that number by their late twenties they are failures as a women.
If she's divorced and into her thirties, greater than 80% chance she's a broken, tormented, hypergamous, predator, feminist. Basically a loser only good for sex. She should be treated as such.
If she's single and unmarried and in her later twenties, she's likely a used up alcoholic whore attempting to predate upon men to extract wealth so she can become the divorced predator above.
Basically if a women isn't married and creating a family no later than 25 she's likely extremely broken and a low value and a worthless mate. I see why Jews push women to invest in college (delay them and create financial burden on a useless degree). I completely understand why many ancient cultures declare women old maids by 25. Because they are. Effectively only good for sex after this point. As Shakespeare makes clear, they become toxic shrews.
A women's capital is her youth, appearance, fertility, and ability to nest (home making). All of which, save the last, are peaking at 16-20. Maybe slightly later if they have truly exceptional genetics. But it's all downhill after that. Whereas men's value is just starting to grow at 25.
This is why marriage of younger woman to older men (16-20f to 25-30m; and the young female age ensured virginity) was once the healthy norm, because it's good for everyone (men and women) and society. Feminism is a Jewish cancer. Any metric which confirms infection is a major red flag.
A women's capital is her youth, appearance, fertility, and ability to nest (home making). All of which, save the last, are peaking at 16-20
Careful with that thin line. Normalization of pedophilia is a violation of the ToS.
This isn't pedo normalization. It certainly is not my objective. This is a historically accurate description of why those norms once existed. Also, this is in the context of marriage, not random abuse of children.
If you feel discussing historical norms and why they existed violate the TOS I'll delete or modify the comment.
I assume you aren't married. Desperate man getting old. Get a dog.
I'm married and our marriage is the envy of all that know us. So much for your judeo-feminist brain rot programming.
You just confirmed you're suffering from judeo-brain rot and judeo-feminism. Oy vey.
(post is archived)