You're equating something to another that aren't equal things.
Or perhaps I'm not explaining myself clearly.
Standard push-up (to me) means starting from the plank position, lowering my chest until it bumps the floor (without resting on the floor), then raising back to a plank. That's one rep.
Option 2: Starting at the plank, lower chest to just above the floor but not touching, hold for three seconds, then raise to a plank. That's one rep.
There are others as well, including inclines, declines, raised foot, etc., but those are the main two I perform.
Standard push-up (to me) means starting from the plank position, lowering my chest until it bumps the floor (without resting on the floor), then raising back to a plank. That's one rep.
So your arms aren't fully extended? You're missing more than half the range of motion. Or do you do planks by fully extending your arms?
(without resting on the floor)
I never once said your chest needed to rest on the floor. Not here, there or anywhere. I said "touch" the ground. I don't get why all this arguing about this fact about a specific exercise. I seriously don't. The list at the end of your reply are modifications on form that are different exercises, work different muscle, similar muscle in different ways, and are very different on structural stresses of the skeletal system. I didn't in OP mention those or any other post or reply.
You:
I don't get why all this arguing about this fact about a specific exercise. I seriously don't.
Also you:
This is not u for debate.
Okay? Those statements agree with each other. My post title agrees with those two as well. A specific exercise is only completed with a full range of motion. Period. You're getting some benefit by doing partials, absolutely. But not as much as you could be getting.
I'll rephrase; I don't get why this simple exercise fact is triggering such intense kvetching from users.
(post is archived)