This is just a textbook Gish Gallop that begs other questions but whatever.
1) here’s an entire playlist of the sun behaving exactly as expected on a flat surface according to the laws of perspective
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbs-VlztQ7VskQCqABgf7zJo
2) This is just word salad. You aren’t demonstrating this experiment or explaining how it wouldn’t work on a flat surface with magnetic north at its center.
3) the force that causes objects to fall has nothing to do with the surface we live on, and even mainstream science can’t explain what gravity is
4) don’t understand the question because you didn’t explain
5) even in an enclosed surface the pressure is greater on the bottom; there is still a pressure gradient
6) , which you also didn’t explain how it proves a spinning ball
7) the reason why has nothing to do with the evidence or proof, and the percentage of people who believe in God is irrelevant to the idea that there is a concerted effort to staunch that belief. Obviously if no one believed in God there would be no reason to dissuade them.
8) Poorly explained question, but compasses point to magnetic north. There is no single “South Pole” and there is no such thing in nature as a dipole spherical magnet, therefore no reason to believe you live on one
So you what you're saying is your just going to dismiss all of these observations with no explanations? That's what I thought.
1)Per your own video none of those observations do the demonstration with a solar filter.
2)I already said these aren't experiments they are observations. We know on a slat surface triangles must have internal angles equaling 180 degrees. Which means equilateral triangle have 60 60 60 degree internal angles. So why can't I make an equilateral triangle to navigate back to my start point if I'm walking on a flat surface?
3)We do know everything accelerates at the same rate no? We know this is the gravitational constant no?
4)pretty simple question I use a pendulum in New York and measure the angle of the drift. My friend in Miami does the same thing measures the angular drift. Why are our angles different?
5) sealed systems do not have gradient. That's just a blatant lie to say otherwise.
And it's not a poor question. I have compass. I cross the equator. It no longer works. Why?
I think we are done here Joe. You demonstrated exactly what I thought you would.
Sealed systems absolutely do have a pressure gradient. I can’t even believe you’re claiming otherwise.
You haven’t done any of these demonstrations or explained how they are exclusive to a spinning ball.
So you're saying when I check the pressure of my tire and it says 38 psi it's only 38 psi closest to the wall of the tire? Or the wheel. What about in my compressor in my show it it not at 200 psi throughout the tank?
I have personally done the solar filter The navigation and the pendulum. The others are demonstrable observations.
Pffff
More gish gallop...
These are responses I expected.
(post is archived)