If you try to advertise a new merchandise by insisting that an outdated method like door-to-door is sufficient, it's still an effort to sell your merchandise, just not as efficient as putting an ad on websites or on TV.
Who will actually turn profit and bring forth an effective change, someone who insists on "the traditional methods" or someone who can take constructive criticism and take on the most effective method?
Bro... optics to get people questioning is the best we can ask for right now. Beyond that, it's up to the questioner to continue learning. You're making this far too complicated.
If it's really so important to you, then be bold enough to add the citation yourself to the image and repost.
Naw, my gripe isn't with the past.
I always stick with the problem of the present, which is the traditional jewish infant genital mutilation procedures being performed at hospitals as we speak.
You want people to learn and accept your legitimacy? Citations, citations, citations. Why do you think research papers always require a bibliography? They're not a legitimate paper unless the sources can be verified. From then on, they get recognition and get fast tracked to being published and accepted by a wider audience.
What portion of the population would you say demands a citation given an abundance of additional information which already confirms it?
(post is archived)