I posit that your conclusion is wayward.
Speak normal English; nobody is impressed.
You're equating the qualities of fear as an impossibility to exist within love -- this is not the same as it being the opposite, which it is often claimed.
If fear can not exist within perfect love, it is logical to conclude that it is in opposition to.
No, that is not a logical conclusion, that is a bastardization of terms. By your 'logic', fire is the opposite of water because it can't exist within it.
Thank you. Many blessings friend.
(post is archived)