Also people regularly mistake braveness with lack of fear. Braveness is when you really fear something but still overcome it.
Also people regularly mistake braveness with lack of fear. Braveness is when you really fear something but still overcome it.
You could say that bravery is the opposite of cowardice.
You could say that bravery is the opposite of cowardice.
Bravery is overcoming the cowardice that sits deep inside all of us. Fuck, it's getting deeper.
Bravery is overcoming the cowardice that sits deep inside all of us. Fuck, it's getting deeper.
It wasn't just our nations which had been subverted, but our language too...
It wasn't just our nations which had been subverted, but our language too...
Filthy neutrals... you never know where their loyalty lies
Filthy neutrals... you never know where their loyalty lies
Notice that both fear and love are forms of care.
Notice that both fear and love are forms of care.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-bCIA_vyVc
They canceled Futurama because it was too good.
They canceled Futurama because it was too good.
Where your fears begin your power ends
Where your fears begin your power ends
I posit that your conclusion is wayward. Fear is the opposite of love and also a result of flawed love. 1 John 4:18 " There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love."
I posit that your conclusion is wayward. Fear is the opposite of love and also a result of flawed love.
1 John 4:18 " There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love."
I posit that your conclusion is wayward.
Speak normal English; nobody is impressed.
You're equating the qualities of fear as an impossibility to exist within love -- this is not the same as it being the opposite, which it is often claimed.
>I posit that your conclusion is wayward.
Speak normal English; nobody is impressed.
You're equating the qualities of fear as an impossibility to exist within love -- this is not the same as it being the opposite, which it is often claimed.
If fear can not exist within perfect love, it is logical to conclude that it is in opposition to.
If fear can not exist within perfect love, it is logical to conclude that it is in opposition to.
No, that is not a logical conclusion, that is a bastardization of terms. By your 'logic', fire is the opposite of water because it can't exist within it.
No, that is not a logical conclusion, that is a bastardization of terms. By your 'logic', fire is the opposite of water because it can't exist within it.
(post is archived)