Agreed. Just to hammer my point home using some bullshit napkin math:
180mph * 10tons = 1800 (slowed and in dirty config looking for airport)
350mph * 400 tons = 140000
Obviously these numbers are bullshit, but they do illiterate the massive difference in energy. Tweak the numbers all you like, but the magnitude of scale in difference remains massive no matter which numbers you use.
You are focused on impact energy. The WTC towers wobbled but remained standing after each impact. So the impact itself didn't take them down.
Want to delve into the thermodynamic differences between the two events? Me either. Lots of hard math and assumptions ...
But, if one believes the heat from burning fuel weakened the steel supporting the towers causing their collapse, one must also explain why tower 7 that was neither hit nor on fire, collapsed.
The official narrative doesn't stand up to scrutiny. I admit, this video doesn't provide a direct comparison, just some similarity of events 71 years apart with a much different outcome ... to get people to think about it instead of swallowing the "official narrative." Anons know why they did it ... Patriot Act, DHS, weaponizing govt against the citizens all in preparation of where we are now, and where they want to take us.
7 is the oddball, isn't it? That one should not have come down.
All of it is surrounded by WTFs. But those pushing pseudo science only serve to further bury whatever the truth actually is about this event.
It's irrelevant is if it did or did not. The entire point of my commentary is to highlight that such videos can ONLY destroy credibility of those attempting to present other information. It can serve no other purpose. The simple math is to highlight why this is the case. The difference in energy is like that of a bullet versus explosion. Vast difference. As such, not comparable in the least.
It's irrelevant is if it did or did not.
Which point are you referring to? What is "it"?
The entire point of my commentary is to highlight that such videos can ONLY destroy credibility of those attempting to present other information. It can serve no other purpose. The simple math is to highlight why this is the case.
This video won't persuade anybody, it simply shows two similar situations with totally different results. Old plane crashes into old building vs new plane crashes into new building ... with dramatically different results. The inquisitive reader might be inclined to research this further.
The difference in energy is like that of a bullet versus explosion. Vast difference. As such, not comparable in the least.
The energy "bullet vs explosion" doesn't matter. The Empire State Building and the twin towers all remained standing long after impact. The south tower collapse occurred at least 56 minutes after impact, north tower much longer.
(post is archived)