You are focused on impact energy. The WTC towers wobbled but remained standing after each impact. So the impact itself didn't take them down.
Want to delve into the thermodynamic differences between the two events? Me either. Lots of hard math and assumptions ...
But, if one believes the heat from burning fuel weakened the steel supporting the towers causing their collapse, one must also explain why tower 7 that was neither hit nor on fire, collapsed.
The official narrative doesn't stand up to scrutiny. I admit, this video doesn't provide a direct comparison, just some similarity of events 71 years apart with a much different outcome ... to get people to think about it instead of swallowing the "official narrative." Anons know why they did it ... Patriot Act, DHS, weaponizing govt against the citizens all in preparation of where we are now, and where they want to take us.
7 is the oddball, isn't it? That one should not have come down.
All of it is surrounded by WTFs. But those pushing pseudo science only serve to further bury whatever the truth actually is about this event.
It's irrelevant is if it did or did not. The entire point of my commentary is to highlight that such videos can ONLY destroy credibility of those attempting to present other information. It can serve no other purpose. The simple math is to highlight why this is the case. The difference in energy is like that of a bullet versus explosion. Vast difference. As such, not comparable in the least.
It's irrelevant is if it did or did not.
Which point are you referring to? What is "it"?
The entire point of my commentary is to highlight that such videos can ONLY destroy credibility of those attempting to present other information. It can serve no other purpose. The simple math is to highlight why this is the case.
This video won't persuade anybody, it simply shows two similar situations with totally different results. Old plane crashes into old building vs new plane crashes into new building ... with dramatically different results. The inquisitive reader might be inclined to research this further.
The difference in energy is like that of a bullet versus explosion. Vast difference. As such, not comparable in the least.
The energy "bullet vs explosion" doesn't matter. The Empire State Building and the twin towers all remained standing long after impact. The south tower collapse occurred at least 56 minutes after impact, north tower much longer.
What is "it"?
It being the cause of the collapse. The impact of this aircraft has no bearing. Different aircraft. Different mass. Different structure & distribution. Different metals ("steel" is not "steel"). Different velocities. Different fuel volumes. Different fuels.
The energy "bullet vs explosion" doesn't matter. The Empire State Building and the twin towers all remained standing long after impact. The south tower collapse occurred at least 56 minutes after impact, north tower much longer.
You're allowing yourself to fall into a trap. You say "doesn't matter" on a post which literally doesn't matter. THAT'S THE POINT!!! At no point did I claim every other fact in the universe doesn't apply. The purpose of spelling this out is because people like you are mentally trapped. Posts like OP literally have ZERO bearing on the issue; regardless of your take on 9/11. The ONLY possible outcome of such posts is they destroy your credibility. So if you want to push alternative explanations, you can't, because you just kicked your own legs out from under yourself.
Anyone claiming stupid shit like, "an airplane once did a thing, therefore all airplanes and things are exactly the same", are, well, idiots. They will be called out as such. The result is you will be attacked and destroyed, even if providing factually accurate information. REGARDLESS OF YOUR POSITION. Period. THIS IS ENTIRELY THE PURPOSE OF THIS TYPE OF PROPAGANDA. IT'S SO YOU DESTROY YOUR OWN CREDIBILITY, THEREFORE NO ONE WILL LISTEN TO YOU.
For the purpose of this discussion, it is 100% irrelevant if the collision caused it or a stampede of elephants parachuting in caused it. If you destroy your own credibility, nothing else you wish to contribute matters. This ultimately means you only harm the truth. Period.
This entire thread is about the psychology of events and not the event itself. As you continue to focus on the event and not the psychology, you only confirm you are mentally trapped. My purpose in explaining all this is to get you out of this mental trap. Which means you are then empowered to present your case, whatever it may be.
Just to bring this home, here's the ONLY valid response to my comments.
You're right. This content has no bearing on the subject. We should ignore it. But let me tell you what I believe are factors....
This way you're not trapped nor entangled with the propaganda.
Or,
You're right.
(post is archived)