Dating is all joo-ed out tho. I remember a post that has actual peer reviewed analysis of 'dinosaur dna and blood iirc . It was a creation channel as opposed to evolution tho. There were dozens of examples of dna , ligament, tissue etc of 'Dinosaurs' dating back hundreds of years not millions . Whatever they were , some survived until the middle ages and were not all extinct millions of years old. Use to be a great ytube channel 10 yrs ago or more that posted actual Middle age texts that speak of various accounts in great detail that basically describe what we would recognize as a 'Terrible lizard' the size of horses and elephants etc, some spat poison others were carnivorous, highly aggressive and territorial. Guarantee the Vatican has plenty of these accounts stashed away never to see the light of normie eyes ...
The only thing joo-ed out is your perspective. I support your right to pursue this line of thought on the principle that scientists have lost their way, but, there is no way anything you just posited is even remotely plausible.
sure bud, completely dismiss everything against your understanding outright without a seconds thought. if i can be bothered i'll try and find the links if they still exist but you'll likely say 'Nope not true, it's too unbelievable'. Enjoy your mainstream historical narrative, buddy, the establishment can never be wrong, when they have everyone blinded by muh science
No, no. I would read links and such but I don't expect links. I am far more forgiving for this sort of view these days than I used to be.
I just shared my immediate opinion of the perspective. It is dismissive outright but if you have proof or not even that, something interesting I may read it when I have time.
(post is archived)