WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

826

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

We actually have pretty good ideas:

1) We know that a lot of them had scales and how their skin looked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CehqV3lfayA

2) I cannot find the video but we do have skin samples with fossilized pigment. Pigment doesn't degrade but it changes chemistry during embedding in fossilized deposits and there are skin samples that provide suggestsions of tints that people think they can use to extrapolate into what the actual pigments of the scales may have been.

3) We actually have flexible t-rex tissue which includes flexible ligaments and blood cells here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-K7_H27Wq4

The blood is degraded and they say all the genetic material has decomposed because of the half life of genes.

It is actually thought that most of the very large fossilized bone has soft tissue at the center of it. Basically, we have 80 million year old trex tissue available to us today.

We know quite a lot about dinos.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Dating is all joo-ed out tho. I remember a post that has actual peer reviewed analysis of 'dinosaur dna and blood iirc . It was a creation channel as opposed to evolution tho. There were dozens of examples of dna , ligament, tissue etc of 'Dinosaurs' dating back hundreds of years not millions . Whatever they were , some survived until the middle ages and were not all extinct millions of years old. Use to be a great ytube channel 10 yrs ago or more that posted actual Middle age texts that speak of various accounts in great detail that basically describe what we would recognize as a 'Terrible lizard' the size of horses and elephants etc, some spat poison others were carnivorous, highly aggressive and territorial. Guarantee the Vatican has plenty of these accounts stashed away never to see the light of normie eyes ...

[–] 0 pt

The only thing joo-ed out is your perspective. I support your right to pursue this line of thought on the principle that scientists have lost their way, but, there is no way anything you just posited is even remotely plausible.

[–] 0 pt

sure bud, completely dismiss everything against your understanding outright without a seconds thought. if i can be bothered i'll try and find the links if they still exist but you'll likely say 'Nope not true, it's too unbelievable'. Enjoy your mainstream historical narrative, buddy, the establishment can never be wrong, when they have everyone blinded by muh science