Definitely are making good points and I forgot about them details. I'm not entirely sure... like with the Paracus Skulls they have European DNA from around the Black Sea and Crimea though they are not a typical Caucasoid Skull. It would be great like you said though if the jews didn't destroy or suppress that information.
Oh yeah, the Paracus skulls. Forrester and others did a great job bringing those to light.
I suspect there were several homo type/ bipeds that lived concurrent/ or overlapped with each other until genocide/ resource depletion or (forced) assimilation of their distinct genetics into the larger group, disappeared them So difficult to get a clear view of these things when deliberate Official / establishment chicanery obfuscates the truth. Add in those ancient (Egyptian Pharaonic/ Mayan et al Cone heads (the legitimate ones not the forced boarding from birth or whatever) to this mix. Reading ancient accounts or passed down myth/ legends on some of these interactions etc is fascinating, but again a curse and pox on the Vatican and Smithsonian.
I just wonder why since the Haplogroups are of European Origin why have none come to light. I would be ecstatic to see an actual Conehead. The skull binding looks ridiculous though but I wonder why they'd skull bind in the first place thinking about it now.
I just remembered the Star Child skull but I haven't heard or don't remember hearing anything about it. H. Florensiensis is another interesting hominid but they died out 20000 years ago allegedly. I think we all are different hominids to a degree.
That said we are all definitely not the same Hominid for example Europeans have no Genetic contribution from niggers. Arabs are mixed breed and Congoids have an 18% ghost species which is around 250+ thousand years less laterally evolved than most of the rest of humanity.
Yep, i recall (hopefully i don't screw it up ) various legitime dna/ anthropic studies that show sub Saharan niggers have a 'ghost dna' which in some papers they actually cite (or at least highly suggestive of) homo-erectus markers iirc with zero neanderthal markers and European ancestry contains markers for neanderthal, Denosavarian (sp) and another early homo type iirc with zero 'ghost homo-erectus dna'. The clear (unwritten) conclusion is that sub-saharan/ african niggers are modern day offshoots of homo-erectus and European is a completely different but very similar sapian (in general terms). It also ties into multiple studies between the two Races of things like skull size, slope of forehead, position of the mandible (under bite etc), bone density and musculature substantiated with generalized studies of IQ quotients, emotion based responses, propensity for aggression, lack of empathy, lack of forethought (understanding consequences) etc.
They are not like us.
Different breeds of dogs (as with all animals/ mammalians and even Botany, Fruits etc for that matter ) show that distinct types can exist within a genus and have measurable (on average) characteristics, traits and temperaments within each clearly definable sub species and that inter-breeding can also enhance various traits (and genetic defects/ illness) or create new 'types', yet apply this to the Homo-sapian and suddenly 'that's racist and verboten'.
(post is archived)