![I'm sure y'all have been wondering about this, right? [949x1726 - 326KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/9WXyES.jpg){kind=link}
even into the 80's people were ridiculed for being gross (like revenge of the nerds, chris farley, ect.). These people were (((given power))) through the media by including them in grievance politics.
Now, because we live in clown world, the more worthless and absurd you are, the more you are worth to society.
The man producing the food? The man supplying you with electricity? You should hate them, they are the worst of the worst. You should mistreat them at every turn. You should abuse their daughters and their society.
The morbidly obese college girl who demands people call her a boy and has trouble dividing a number by 4 (because you eat the whole pizza, not 1/4 of it) is who you should respect and should be advanced in society. Well, her, and jews.
I hate clown world.
and sex with fat chicks.
I tried it once, thought I was being progressive.
I aint never goin back there. UnderBoobSweat.
Yea. Underboobsweat
I released the FUPA.
I aint never goin back.
We’ve politicized fatness. Like everything else.
Chris Farley was funny. Nobody thought that was permission or encouragement to be fat. Everyone knew it was better to be thin than fat, but that nobody needs to be treated like they’re evil because theyre fat.
You are conflating degenerates with fat people. You are conflating fatness with collaborating with jews or something. Sometimes its just fat.
If some of you incels find a nice girl/guy to reproduce with and they’re only problem is being a fatty, fucking go for it. Fat is fixable. Extinction is forever.
Having kids with a fat person is dysgenic. Not only does that put the baby's life in danger from the health risks, their average IQ is lower. Inflammation from obesity does a lot of damage to a developing baby. Not to mention fat people are more likely to have issues conceiving a child in the first place. Men don't get a pass either, it affects their fertility too. If someone can't eat less to lessen risks of their future children dying, born early or deformed, having lower IQ ect I would say they're too selfish to be considered a potential partner. Give them the chance to lose weight but if they won't they're too selfish to be a parent. Check out these links if you don't believe me. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989730/ https://www.medpagetoday.com/obgyn/pregnancy/90300#:~:text=Risk%20of%20ectopic%20pregnancy%2C%20miscarriage,University%20in%20California%2C%20and%20colleagues. http://gizmodo.com/5909157/obese-mothers-give-birth-to-less-intelligent-children
Having kids with a fat person is dysgenic
No it isnt. Women have a stronger propensity to put on weight. They have more adipose tissue. That is because it is useful to have extra fat stores when you are pregnant and nursing. Im not talking about 400 lb women. But there is nothing dysgenic about having a baby if you are 50 lbs over weight.
Look at this chart, there is barely any difference at all between normal weight and overweight category for infant mortality for a white woman at up to 30 BMI. Thats around 174 lbs for a 5’4” woman. Fat. Infant mortality is actually worse for an underweight woman which is 105 lbs for a 5’4” woman. Nobody’s on here talking about the dysgenics of 105 lb women though, funny.
There is no evidence that overweight causes low IQ. That is a correlation. You didnt give me a link to that study and the article doesnt list one. Did it adjust for race? IQ of the mom correlates to weight of mom and IQ of baby. But if you know a fat chick and shes got a 120 IQ it is a non-issue.
Im not talking about 400 lb whales here. But I think I have a sense of what passes for dysgenic around here and guess what, you’re wrong. Moms need extra body fat to nourish the brain of the baby which needs FAT.
(post is archived)